PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBSIX vs. HSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBSIX vs. HSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PBSIX having a 33.21% return and HSPGX slightly lower at 31.71%.


PBSIX

1D
-2.75%
1M
4.99%
YTD
33.21%
6M
28.09%
1Y
58.83%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
2.13%
10Y*

HSPGX

1D
-2.29%
1M
7.66%
YTD
31.71%
6M
26.85%
1Y
67.21%
3Y*
34.10%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
17.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBSIX vs. HSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBSIX
Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund
33.21%12.05%3.75%21.83%-42.90%16.44%50.02%21.22%1.96%1.42%
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
31.71%31.62%28.04%18.66%-24.65%3.59%38.49%28.33%-12.16%6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PBSIX and HSPGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2017

0.86

The correlation between PBSIX and HSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBSIX vs. HSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBSIX
PBSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PBSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
PBSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

HSPGX
HSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
HSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBSIX vs. HSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBSIXHSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.42

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.66

4.96

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.56

20.67

-4.11

PBSIX vs. HSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the HSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBSIX and HSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBSIX vs. HSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBSIX drawdown since its inception was -52.49%, smaller than the maximum HSPGX drawdown of -60.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBSIX and HSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBSIXHSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.49%

-60.28%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

-14.41%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-28.63%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.49%

-38.65%

-13.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-2.29%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.46%

-18.98%

-2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

3.44%

+0.37%

Volatility

PBSIX vs. HSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) has a higher volatility of 10.56% compared to Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) at 9.63%. This indicates that PBSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBSIXHSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.56%

9.63%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.22%

20.43%

+2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.31%

26.60%

+3.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.05%

25.73%

+3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.66%

25.23%

+2.43%

PBSIX vs. HSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBSIX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than HSPGX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBSIX vs. HSPGX - Dividend Comparison

PBSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
9.67%12.74%21.85%6.43%8.77%19.11%8.48%1.45%11.86%
PBSIX
Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.60%0.11%0.48%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PBSIX and HSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PBSIX has higher volatility (10.56%) compared to HSPGX (9.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBSIX dropped -52.49% vs HSPGX's -60.28%.

HSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBSIX and HSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer