PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBSE vs. PFRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBSE vs. PFRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - September (PBSE) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBSE achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly higher than PFRL's 2.02% return.


PBSE

1D
0.10%
1M
1.30%
YTD
4.41%
6M
5.07%
1Y
12.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PFRL

1D
0.05%
1M
0.71%
YTD
2.02%
6M
2.90%
1Y
6.45%
3Y*
8.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBSE vs. PFRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PBSE
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - September
4.41%10.97%5.75%
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
2.02%6.25%5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PBSE and PFRL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2024

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBSE vs. PFRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBSE
PBSE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PBSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBSE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PBSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBSE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

PFRL
PFRL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PFRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PFRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFRL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBSE vs. PFRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - September (PBSE) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBSEPFRLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.73

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

5.16

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.03

17.56

+4.47

PBSE vs. PFRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the PFRL Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBSE and PFRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBSEPFRLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

3.34

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.58

1.67

-0.09

Drawdowns

PBSE vs. PFRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBSE drawdown since its inception was -8.35%, smaller than the maximum PFRL drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBSE and PFRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBSEPFRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.35%

-8.83%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-1.25%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-0.44%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.37%

+0.22%

Volatility

PBSE vs. PFRL - Volatility Comparison

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - September (PBSE) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) have volatilities of 0.43% and 0.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBSEPFRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.43%

0.42%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.41%

1.58%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.52%

1.94%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

4.86%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.66%

4.86%

+1.80%

PBSE vs. PFRL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBSE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PFRL's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBSE vs. PFRL - Dividend Comparison

PBSE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PFRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PBSE
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - September
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
6.83%7.34%8.96%9.84%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBSE and PFRL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBSE has higher volatility (0.43%) compared to PFRL (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBSE dropped -8.35% vs PFRL's -8.83%.

On 1-year performance, PBSE leads with 12.98% vs 6.45% for PFRL. On fees, PBSE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PBSE has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBSE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for PFRL.

PFRL has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 0.00% for PBSE.

PBSE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PFRL is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBSE and 0.72% for PFRL.

PFRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBSE and PFRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer