PBSE vs. PFRL
PBSE (PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - September) and PFRL (PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBSE is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM, while PFRL is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PBSE returned 12.98% vs 6.45% for PFRL. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBSE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for PFRL.
Performance
PBSE vs. PFRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBSE achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly higher than PFRL's 2.02% return.
PBSE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 4.41%
- 6M
- 5.07%
- 1Y
- 12.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFRL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- 8.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBSE vs. PFRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PBSE PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - September | 4.41% | 10.97% | 5.75% |
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF | 2.02% | 6.25% | 5.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBSE and PFRL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2024 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBSE vs. PFRL — Risk / Return Rank
PBSE
PFRL
PBSE vs. PFRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - September (PBSE) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBSE | PFRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.73 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 5.16 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.03 | 17.56 | +4.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBSE | PFRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88 | 3.34 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.58 | 1.67 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
PBSE vs. PFRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBSE drawdown since its inception was -8.35%, smaller than the maximum PFRL drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBSE and PFRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBSE | PFRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.35% | -8.83% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.15% | -1.25% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -0.44% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 0.37% | +0.22% |
Volatility
PBSE vs. PFRL - Volatility Comparison
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - September (PBSE) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) have volatilities of 0.43% and 0.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBSE | PFRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.43% | 0.42% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.41% | 1.58% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.52% | 1.94% | +2.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.66% | 4.86% | +1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.66% | 4.86% | +1.80% |
PBSE vs. PFRL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBSE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PFRL's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBSE vs. PFRL - Dividend Comparison
PBSE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PFRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBSE PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF | 6.83% | 7.34% | 8.96% | 9.84% | 3.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBSE and PFRL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBSE has higher volatility (0.43%) compared to PFRL (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBSE dropped -8.35% vs PFRL's -8.83%.
On 1-year performance, PBSE leads with 12.98% vs 6.45% for PFRL. On fees, PBSE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PBSE has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBSE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for PFRL.
PFRL has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 0.00% for PBSE.
PBSE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PFRL is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBSE and 0.72% for PFRL.
PFRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBSE and PFRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer