PBQQ vs. QQQH
PBQQ (PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF) and QQQH (NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — PBQQ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM, while QQQH is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Neos. Over the past year, PBQQ returned 28.19% vs 24.93% for QQQH. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBQQ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQH.
Performance
PBQQ vs. QQQH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBQQ achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly higher than QQQH's 1.73% return.
PBQQ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQH
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 3.42%
- 1Y
- 24.93%
- 3Y*
- 20.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- —
PBQQ vs. QQQH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 4.74% | 15.44% |
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 1.73% | 14.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBQQ and QQQH is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025 | 0.95 |
The correlation between PBQQ and QQQH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBQQ vs. QQQH — Risk / Return Rank
PBQQ
QQQH
PBQQ vs. QQQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBQQ | QQQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.46 | 2.37 | +1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.32 | 3.27 | +2.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 1.46 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.53 | 3.29 | +2.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.21 | 14.24 | +11.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBQQ | QQQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 2.37 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.72 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
PBQQ vs. QQQH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBQQ drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, smaller than the maximum QQQH drawdown of -31.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQQ and QQQH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBQQ | QQQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -31.24% | +18.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.71% | -6.96% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -8.44% | +7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 1.61% | -0.62% |
Volatility
PBQQ vs. QQQH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) is 3.56%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that PBQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBQQ | QQQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 4.19% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.87% | 8.20% | -2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.22% | 10.61% | -2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 13.37% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 13.48% | -1.13% |
PBQQ vs. QQQH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBQQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQH's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBQQ vs. QQQH - Dividend Comparison
PBQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than QQQH's 9.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 9.00% | 8.86% | 7.53% | 7.18% | 9.05% | 7.77% | 7.48% | 0.65% |