PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBQQ vs. QQQH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBQQ vs. QQQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBQQ achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly higher than QQQH's 1.73% return.


PBQQ

1D
0.57%
1M
5.21%
YTD
4.74%
6M
7.46%
1Y
28.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQH

1D
0.52%
1M
3.28%
YTD
1.73%
6M
3.42%
1Y
24.93%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBQQ vs. QQQH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PBQQ and QQQH is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.95

The correlation between PBQQ and QQQH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 — a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBQQ vs. QQQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBQQ
PBQQ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PBQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PBQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQH
QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBQQ vs. QQQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBQQQQQHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.46

2.37

+1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.32

3.27

+2.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.46

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.53

3.29

+2.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

26.21

14.24

+11.97

PBQQ vs. QQQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBQQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is higher than the QQQH Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBQQ and QQQH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBQQQQQHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46

2.37

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.72

+0.58

Drawdowns

PBQQ vs. QQQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBQQ drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, smaller than the maximum QQQH drawdown of -31.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQQ and QQQH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PBQQQQQHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.92%

-31.24%

+18.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.71%

-6.96%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-8.44%

+7.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.61%

-0.62%

Volatility

PBQQ vs. QQQH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) is 3.56%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that PBQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PBQQQQQHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

4.19%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.87%

8.20%

-2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.22%

10.61%

-2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.35%

13.37%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.35%

13.48%

-1.13%

PBQQ vs. QQQH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBQQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQH's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBQQ vs. QQQH - Dividend Comparison

PBQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than QQQH's 9.00% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
PBQQ
PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
9.00%8.86%7.53%7.18%9.05%7.77%7.48%0.65%