PBP vs. YCS
PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - PBP is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PBP returned 7.14%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for YCS. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBP charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
PBP vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBP achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, PBP has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 7.14%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.
PBP
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 6.44%
- 1Y
- 18.32%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- 7.14%
YCS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 23.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
PBP vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 4.90% | 8.49% | 19.83% | 11.59% | -11.82% | 19.97% | -3.31% | 14.60% | -5.57% | 11.98% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.17% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBP and YCS is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2008 | 0.16 |
The correlation between PBP and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBP vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
PBP
YCS
PBP vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBP | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.35 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 3.97 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.66 | 12.40 | +6.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBP | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 1.92 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.12 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.65 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.33 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
PBP vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBP drawdown since its inception was -43.43%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBP and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBP | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.43% | -49.56% | +6.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.22% | -8.30% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | -23.05% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -27.32% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | -27.32% | -5.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -19.93% | +13.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 2.66% | -1.68% |
Volatility
PBP vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) is 0.93%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that PBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBP | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 2.75% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.53% | 12.32% | -6.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.87% | 17.27% | -10.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.86% | 21.10% | -9.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.66% | 19.01% | -5.35% |
PBP vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBP vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
PBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.16%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 11.16% | 11.12% | 9.36% | 3.35% | 1.33% | 6.21% | 1.41% | 5.04% | 2.59% | 10.86% | 2.56% | 6.19% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBP and YCS have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YCS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to PBP (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBP dropped -43.43% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 12.34% vs 7.14% for PBP. On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 7.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.16%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
PBP is categorized as Derivative Income, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. PBP tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PBP and 1.00% for YCS.
PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBP and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer