PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBOG vs. EMHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBOG vs. EMHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBOG achieves a 32.22% return, which is significantly higher than EMHY's 2.80% return.


PBOG

1D
1.23%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
32.22%
6M
29.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMHY

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.38%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.49%
1Y
12.96%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
4.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBOG vs. EMHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PBOG and EMHY is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025

-0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBOG vs. EMHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBOG

EMHY
EMHY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EMHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EMHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBOG vs. EMHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PBOG vs. EMHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBOGEMHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.31

0.50

+2.81

Drawdowns

PBOG vs. EMHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBOG drawdown since its inception was -11.45%, smaller than the maximum EMHY drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBOG and EMHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBOGEMHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.45%

-30.11%

+18.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.81%

-0.37%

-6.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-4.90%

+1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

Volatility

PBOG vs. EMHY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBOGEMHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.67%

5.65%

+18.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.67%

9.10%

+14.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

10.66%

+13.01%

PBOG vs. EMHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBOG has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than EMHY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBOG vs. EMHY - Dividend Comparison

PBOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than EMHY's 6.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
6.41%6.52%6.86%6.73%7.08%5.58%5.44%5.72%6.79%5.59%6.43%6.99%
PBOG
Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF
0.13%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBOG and EMHY have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMHY.

EMHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.41%, compared with 0.13% for PBOG.

PBOG is categorized as Oil & Gas, while EMHY is Emerging Markets Bonds. PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index, while EMHY tracks J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets High Yield Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Blocks and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBOG and 0.50% for EMHY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBOG and EMHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer