PBJ vs. TRFK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PBJ (Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBJ is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index, while TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PBJ returned 2.47%/yr vs 50.88%/yr for TRFK. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBJ charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TRFK.

Performance

PBJ vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBJ achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 61.41% return.

PBJ

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: -2.97%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 4.88%
• 1Y: -0.24%
• 3Y*: 2.47%
• 5Y*: 3.75%
• 10Y*: 5.17%

TRFK

• 1D: -6.99%
• 1M: 9.38%
• YTD: 61.41%
• 6M: 59.46%
• 1Y: 85.46%
• 3Y*: 50.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBJ vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF	5.32%	-1.86%	2.49%	2.31%	3.10%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	61.41%	26.81%	38.30%	66.63%	-10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between PBJ and TRFK is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022	0.23

The correlation between PBJ and TRFK shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PBJ vs. TRFK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PBJ	TRFK
Consumer Defensive	78.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	-
Industrials	5.6%	12.0%
Basic Materials	5.1%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Communication Services	-	0.6%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Technology	-	87.5%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PBJ vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBJ

PBJ Risk / Return Rank: 8
PBJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
PBJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
PBJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8
PBJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PBJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8

TRFK

TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 76
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBJ vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBJ	TRFK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	2.69	-2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.06	3.14	-3.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.42	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.02	4.39	-4.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.04	10.31	-10.35

PBJ vs. TRFK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBJ Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the TRFK Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBJ and TRFK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBJ vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBJ drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, which is greater than TRFK's maximum drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJ and TRFK.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBJ	TRFK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.15%	-29.06%	-10.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.48%	-19.56%	+7.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.99%	-29.06%	+16.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.42%	-6.99%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-6.04%	+0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.41%	8.32%	-2.91%

Volatility

PBJ vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) is 4.33%, while Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a volatility of 18.36%. This indicates that PBJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBJ	TRFK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	18.36%	-14.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.40%	26.50%	-17.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.74%	32.01%	-19.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.77%	29.84%	-16.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.13%	29.84%	-14.71%

PBJ vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBJ vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison

PBJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than TRFK's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF	1.30%	1.83%	1.11%	1.81%	1.82%	0.90%	1.12%	1.21%	1.41%	0.70%	1.56%	1.24%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.40%	0.20%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBJ and TRFK in my portfolio?

PBJ and TRFK have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBJ or TRFK?

TRFK has higher volatility (18.36%) compared to PBJ (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBJ dropped -39.15% vs TRFK's -29.06%.

Which ETF is better, PBJ or TRFK?

On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 50.88% vs 2.47% for PBJ. On fees, TRFK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PBJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBJ or TRFK?

Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 50.88% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBJ or TRFK?

TRFK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PBJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBJ or TRFK?

PBJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.

What is the main difference between PBJ and TRFK?

PBJ is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while TRFK is Technology Equities. PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index, while TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PBJ and 0.60% for TRFK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.