PBJ vs. PSL
PBJ (Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF) and PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBJ is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index, while PSL is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PBJ returned 5.21%/yr vs 8.26%/yr for PSL. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBJ charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PSL.
Performance
PBJ vs. PSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBJ achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly lower than PSL's 10.94% return. Over the past 10 years, PBJ has underperformed PSL with an annualized return of 5.21%, while PSL has yielded a comparatively higher 8.26% annualized return.
PBJ
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 4.54%
- 1Y
- 2.02%
- 3Y*
- 2.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- 5.21%
PSL
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 10.94%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.92%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
PBJ vs. PSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 5.45% | -1.86% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 3.14% | 26.88% | 5.53% | 17.50% | -11.21% | 1.87% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 10.94% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | 6.88% | 18.15% | 14.16% | 0.92% | 21.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBJ and PSL is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PBJ and PSL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
PBJ vs. PSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBJ
PSL
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
PBJ
PSL
Consumer Cyclical
PBJ
PSL
Industrials
PBJ
PSL
Basic Materials
PBJ
PSL
-
Financial Services
PBJ
PSL
Communication Services
PBJ
-
PSL
-
Energy
PBJ
-
PSL
-
Healthcare
PBJ
-
PSL
-
Real Estate
PBJ
-
PSL
-
Technology
PBJ
-
PSL
-
Utilities
PBJ
-
PSL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBJ vs. PSL — Risk / Return Rank
PBJ
PSL
PBJ vs. PSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBJ | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.04 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 0.19 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.37 | 0.41 | -0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBJ vs. PSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBJ drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, smaller than the maximum PSL drawdown of -41.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJ and PSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBJ | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.15% | -41.58% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.48% | -13.64% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.99% | -13.64% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.81% | -19.45% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.49% | -34.67% | +6.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -4.83% | -2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -5.81% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.44% | 6.20% | -0.76% |
Volatility
PBJ vs. PSL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) have volatilities of 4.33% and 4.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBJ | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 4.39% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 9.20% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.71% | 13.11% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 15.16% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 16.51% | -1.38% |
PBJ vs. PSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than PSL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBJ vs. PSL - Dividend Comparison
PBJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than PSL's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 1.30% | 1.83% | 1.11% | 1.81% | 1.82% | 0.90% | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 0.70% | 1.56% | 1.24% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.75% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBJ and PSL have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSL has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to PBJ (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBJ dropped -39.15% vs PSL's -41.58%.
On 10-year performance, PSL leads with 8.26% vs 5.21% for PBJ. On fees, PSL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSL has performed better with a 8.26% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PBJ.
PBJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.75% for PSL.
PBJ is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while PSL is Momentum. PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index, while PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PBJ and 0.60% for PSL.
PSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBJ and PSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer