PBJ vs. MCD
PBJ (Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF) is Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index, while MCD (McDonald's Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, PBJ returned 5.17%/yr vs 11.21%/yr for MCD. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PBJ vs. MCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBJ achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly higher than MCD's -10.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PBJ has underperformed MCD with an annualized return of 5.17%, while MCD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.21% annualized return.
PBJ
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- -0.24%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
MCD
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- -10.01%
- 6M
- -11.52%
- 1Y
- -3.89%
- 3Y*
- 0.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
PBJ vs. MCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 5.32% | -1.86% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 3.14% | 26.88% | 5.53% | 17.50% | -11.21% | 1.87% |
MCD McDonald's Corporation | -10.01% | 7.89% | 0.14% | 15.06% | 0.51% | 27.79% | 11.30% | 13.97% | 5.78% | 45.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBJ and MCD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.51 |
The correlation between PBJ and MCD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBJ vs. MCD — Risk / Return Rank
PBJ
MCD
PBJ vs. MCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBJ | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.98 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | -0.20 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | -0.49 | +0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBJ vs. MCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBJ drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, smaller than the maximum MCD drawdown of -73.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJ and MCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBJ | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.15% | -73.20% | +34.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.48% | -19.82% | +7.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.99% | -19.82% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.81% | -19.82% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.49% | -36.90% | +8.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.42% | -19.36% | +11.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -14.90% | +9.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 7.91% | -2.50% |
Volatility
PBJ vs. MCD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) is 4.33%, while McDonald's Corporation (MCD) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that PBJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBJ | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 5.81% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.40% | 12.43% | -3.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 16.88% | -4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 17.34% | -3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 20.44% | -5.31% |
Dividends
PBJ vs. MCD - Dividend Comparison
PBJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than MCD's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | 2.71% | 2.35% | 2.34% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.97% | 2.91% |
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 1.30% | 1.83% | 1.11% | 1.81% | 1.82% | 0.90% | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 0.70% | 1.56% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBJ and MCD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCD has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to PBJ (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBJ dropped -39.15% vs MCD's -73.20%.
PBJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBJ and MCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer