PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBJ vs. FAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBJ vs. FAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBJ achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than FAI's 31.06% return.


PBJ

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.54%
6M
-2.88%
YTD
6.99%
1Y
1.76%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
4.87%
ALL TIME*
7.10%

FAI

1D
-1.05%
1M
1.90%
6M
37.79%
YTD
31.06%
1Y
46.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
40.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.72M$2.75M$3.66M
$470.11K$547.08K$805.61K

PBJ vs. FAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
6.99%-1.86%-1.61%
FAI
First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF
31.06%33.37%2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PBJ and FAI is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

-0.03

The correlation between PBJ and FAI shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBJ vs. FAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBJ
PBJ Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PBJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PBJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBJ Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FAI
FAI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAI Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBJ vs. FAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBJFAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.26

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

2.46

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.35

6.36

-6.02

PBJ vs. FAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the FAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBJ and FAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBJ vs. FAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBJ drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, which is greater than FAI's maximum drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJ and FAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBJFAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.15%

-27.82%

-11.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-18.84%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.95%

-6.91%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-5.78%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

7.27%

-2.18%

Volatility

PBJ vs. FAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) is 4.60%, while First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) has a volatility of 10.63%. This indicates that PBJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBJFAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

10.63%

-6.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

24.94%

-14.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

29.46%

-16.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

31.45%

-17.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

31.45%

-16.29%

PBJ vs. FAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than FAI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBJ vs. FAI - Dividend Comparison

PBJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAI
First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
1.28%1.83%1.11%1.81%1.82%0.90%1.12%1.21%1.41%0.70%1.56%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBJ and FAI have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAI has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to PBJ (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBJ dropped -39.15% vs FAI's -27.82%.

On 1-year performance, FAI leads with 46.14% vs 1.76% for PBJ. On fees, PBJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, PBJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FAI has performed better with a 46.14% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FAI.

PBJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.

PBJ is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while FAI is Artificial Intelligence. PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index, while FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PBJ and 0.65% for FAI.

FAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBJ and FAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer