PBFS vs. CI
PBFS (Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.) and CI (Cigna Corporation) are both stocks. PBFS operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while CI operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, PBFS returned 5.77%/yr vs 3.21%/yr for CI. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PBFS vs. CI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBFS achieves a 17.36% return, which is significantly higher than CI's -1.09% return.
PBFS
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- 11.25%
- YTD
- 17.36%
- 6M
- 17.36%
- 1Y
- 37.80%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- —
CI
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- YTD
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- -11.72%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
PBFS vs. CI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBFS Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. | 17.36% | 17.01% | 15.08% | -12.19% | 0.71% | 7.10% | -30.96% | 3.80% |
CI Cigna Corporation | -1.09% | 1.72% | -6.27% | -7.97% | 46.68% | 12.29% | 1.83% | 15.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBFS and CI is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2019 | 0.17 |
The correlation between PBFS and CI shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (3 years) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PBFS:
$385.11M
CI:
$71.48B
PBFS:
$0.81
CI:
$23.59
PBFS:
19.53
CI:
11.48
PBFS:
0.08
CI:
0.66
PBFS:
2.99
CI:
0.26
PBFS:
1.17
CI:
1.69
PBFS:
$129.33M
CI:
$277.94B
PBFS:
$94.41M
CI:
$19.38B
PBFS:
$25.37M
CI:
$10.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBFS vs. CI — Risk / Return Rank
PBFS
CI
PBFS vs. CI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS) and Cigna Corporation (CI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBFS | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.96 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | -0.44 | +4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.90 | -0.81 | +9.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBFS | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | -0.36 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.11 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.34 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
PBFS vs. CI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBFS drawdown since its inception was -48.33%, smaller than the maximum CI drawdown of -84.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBFS and CI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBFS | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.33% | -84.34% | +36.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -26.54% | +16.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -32.10% | +11.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.89% | -32.10% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.78% | -23.95% | +18.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.66% | -18.82% | -7.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 14.47% | -10.21% |
Volatility
PBFS vs. CI - Volatility Comparison
Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS) has a higher volatility of 12.09% compared to Cigna Corporation (CI) at 8.14%. This indicates that PBFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBFS | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.09% | 8.14% | +3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.96% | 18.19% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.51% | 32.75% | -8.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.51% | 28.35% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.34% | 30.71% | +3.63% |
Dividends
PBFS vs. CI - Dividend Comparison
PBFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI Cigna Corporation | 1.69% | 2.19% | 2.03% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
PBFS Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PBFS vs. CI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. and Cigna Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PBFS vs. CI - Profitability Comparison
PBFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 23.83M and revenue of 32.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.9%.
CI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 68.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PBFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.71M and revenue of 32.23M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.
CI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported an operating income of 2.36B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.
PBFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 5.29M and revenue of 32.23M, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.
CI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a net income of 1.65B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PBFS and CI have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBFS has higher volatility (12.09%) compared to CI (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBFS dropped -48.33% vs CI's -84.34%.
PBFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBFS and CI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer