PBFR vs. NVDO

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

PBFR (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBFR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.

Performance

PBFR vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBFR achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 16.35% return.

PBFR

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.89%
• 6M: 4.75%
• YTD: 5.20%
• 1Y: 10.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.48%
• 6M: 15.95%
• YTD: 16.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBFR vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF	5.20%	3.87%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	16.35%	10.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PBFR and NVDO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

PBFR vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBFR

PBFR Risk / Return Rank: 92
PBFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
PBFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PBFR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PBFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PBFR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

NVDO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBFR vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBFR	NVDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.90	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.07	—	—

Drawdowns

PBFR vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBFR drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBFR and NVDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBFR	NVDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.50%	-16.25%	+7.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-4.73%	+4.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.62%	-4.96%	+4.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PBFR	NVDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.07%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.55%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.29%	31.13%	-26.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.78%	31.13%	-24.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.78%	31.13%	-24.35%

PBFR vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBFR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBFR vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than NVDO's 14.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	14.32%	16.66%	0.00%
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBFR and NVDO in my portfolio?

PBFR and NVDO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PBFR or NVDO?

On fees, PBFR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBFR or NVDO?

PBFR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBFR or NVDO?

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 0.01% for PBFR.

What is the main difference between PBFR and NVDO?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBFR and 0.77% for NVDO.