PBDE vs. QB
PBDE (PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - December) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. PBDE is actively managed, while QB is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBDE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.
Performance
PBDE vs. QB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBDE achieves a 4.81% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 10.47% return.
PBDE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 4.81%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- 1Y
- 15.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QB
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBDE vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBDE PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - December | 4.81% | 8.21% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 10.47% | 5.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBDE and QB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBDE vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank
PBDE
QB
PBDE vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - December (PBDE) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBDE | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.58 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBDE | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 3.17 | -1.64 |
Drawdowns
PBDE vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBDE drawdown since its inception was -8.73%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDE and QB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBDE | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.73% | -1.83% | -6.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.30% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -0.34% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | — | — |
Volatility
PBDE vs. QB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBDE | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.66% | 5.75% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 5.75% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 5.75% | +1.40% |
PBDE vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBDE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBDE vs. QB - Dividend Comparison
PBDE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PBDE PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 0.62% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBDE and QB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBDE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBDE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QB.
QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for PBDE.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBDE and 0.58% for QB.
Find the right allocation for PBDE and QB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer