PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBDCX vs. PCRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBDCX vs. PCRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBDCX achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than PCRIX's 21.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PBDCX has underperformed PCRIX with an annualized return of 1.30%, while PCRIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.65% annualized return.


PBDCX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.66%
6M
-1.73%
YTD
-1.42%
1Y
1.07%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
-1.28%
10Y*
1.30%
ALL TIME*
3.85%

PCRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
6.98%
6M
11.90%
YTD
21.76%
1Y
33.17%
3Y*
14.27%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*
8.65%
ALL TIME*
1.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PBDCX vs. PCRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBDCX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C
-1.42%7.27%2.10%6.82%-17.38%-2.01%6.29%13.44%-3.12%6.73%
PCRIX
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund
21.76%17.05%10.59%-5.91%8.94%33.35%0.79%12.29%-13.77%2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PBDCX and PCRIX is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2004

0.11

The correlation between PBDCX and PCRIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBDCX vs. PCRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBDCX
PBDCX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
PBDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

PCRIX
PCRIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PCRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PCRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBDCX vs. PCRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBDCXPCRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.32

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

2.14

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.44

7.15

-5.70

PBDCX vs. PCRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBDCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the PCRIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBDCX and PCRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBDCX vs. PCRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBDCX drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, smaller than the maximum PCRIX drawdown of -82.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDCX and PCRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDCXPCRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

-82.24%

+58.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.98%

-14.44%

+10.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.80%

-14.44%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.70%

-34.44%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.73%

-39.07%

+15.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.62%

-41.50%

+34.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-47.93%

+43.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

4.34%

-2.83%

Volatility

PBDCX vs. PCRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) is 1.22%, while PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that PBDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBDCXPCRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

4.56%

-3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.78%

14.01%

-10.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.60%

16.92%

-12.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.37%

19.61%

-13.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.76%

17.09%

-11.33%

PBDCX vs. PCRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBDCX has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PCRIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBDCX vs. PCRIX - Dividend Comparison

PBDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than PCRIX's 9.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBDCX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C
3.49%3.55%3.21%2.45%2.46%3.48%2.69%2.82%3.04%3.33%2.76%5.47%
PCRIX
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund
9.95%5.61%8.34%6.57%46.23%22.74%1.56%4.00%5.94%8.14%0.91%5.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBDCX and PCRIX have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCRIX has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to PBDCX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBDCX dropped -23.73% vs PCRIX's -82.24%.

PCRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBDCX and PCRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer