PBDCX vs. PCN
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN).
PBDCX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Sep 3, 2004. PCN is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 20, 2001.
Performance
PBDCX vs. PCN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PBDCX vs. PCN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBDCX PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C | -1.80% | 7.27% | 2.10% | 6.82% | -17.38% | -2.01% | 6.29% | 13.44% | -3.12% | 6.73% |
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | -4.21% | 5.55% | 19.52% | 16.22% | -22.88% | 6.93% | -2.19% | 39.10% | -5.94% | 26.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBDCX achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly higher than PCN's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, PBDCX has underperformed PCN with an annualized return of 1.75%, while PCN has yielded a comparatively higher 8.27% annualized return.
PBDCX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -3.44%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 6M
- -1.12%
- 1Y
- 2.59%
- 3Y*
- 3.54%
- 5Y*
- -0.52%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
PCN
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -6.22%
- 1Y
- -3.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PBDCX vs. PCN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBDCX has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PCN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PBDCX vs. PCN — Risk / Return Rank
PBDCX
PCN
PBDCX vs. PCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBDCX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | -0.20 | +0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | -0.15 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.97 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | -0.20 | +1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | -0.66 | +3.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBDCX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | -0.20 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.14 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.38 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.39 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between PBDCX and PCN is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PBDCX vs. PCN - Dividend Comparison
PBDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than PCN's 11.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBDCX PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C | 3.39% | 3.55% | 3.21% | 2.45% | 2.46% | 3.48% | 2.69% | 2.82% | 3.04% | 3.33% | 2.76% | 5.47% |
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | 11.34% | 10.58% | 10.06% | 10.88% | 12.66% | 7.89% | 7.83% | 7.37% | 9.60% | 7.85% | 11.98% | 10.22% |
Drawdowns
PBDCX vs. PCN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBDCX drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, smaller than the maximum PCN drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDCX and PCN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBDCX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.73% | -61.12% | +37.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.98% | -13.78% | +9.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.70% | -33.39% | +9.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.73% | -50.27% | +26.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.98% | -6.71% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -7.22% | +3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 4.32% | -3.12% |
Volatility
PBDCX vs. PCN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) is 2.21%, while PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that PBDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBDCX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 5.81% | -3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 8.64% | -5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.08% | 15.69% | -10.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.32% | 16.55% | -10.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.72% | 21.97% | -16.25% |