PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBD vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBD vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBD achieves a 38.50% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 62.18% return.


PBD

1D
-0.93%
1M
6.10%
YTD
38.50%
6M
39.82%
1Y
92.04%
3Y*
8.96%
5Y*
-3.66%
10Y*
9.45%

USOY

1D
1.45%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
62.18%
6M
59.35%
1Y
57.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBD vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
38.50%43.65%-16.49%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
62.18%-7.93%7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between PBD and USOY is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024

-0.00

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PBD and USOY has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.00 to -0.23, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBD vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBD
PBD Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBD vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBDUSOYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.96

1.89

+2.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.64

2.30

+2.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.35

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.65

4.03

+4.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

26.96

7.74

+19.22

PBD vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBD Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is higher than the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBD and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBDUSOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96

1.89

+2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.99

-0.96

Drawdowns

PBD vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBD drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than USOY's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBD and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.60%

-17.46%

-61.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-14.29%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.02%

-5.11%

-33.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.40%

-6.47%

-46.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

7.42%

-3.99%

Volatility

PBD vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) is 8.57%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that PBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBDUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.57%

11.62%

-3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.00%

27.18%

-10.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.41%

30.44%

-7.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.37%

26.13%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.26%

26.13%

+1.13%

PBD vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBD vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

PBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than USOY's 54.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
1.63%2.71%1.81%2.85%2.98%0.67%0.48%1.83%1.86%1.76%2.04%1.24%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
54.16%104.32%48.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBD and USOY have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOY has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to PBD (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBD dropped -78.60% vs USOY's -17.46%.

On 1-year performance, PBD leads with 92.04% vs 57.29% for USOY. On fees, PBD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, PBD has been the lower-risk option at 8.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PBD has performed better with a 92.04% return vs 57.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.16%, compared with 1.63% for PBD.

PBD is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PBD and 1.22% for USOY.

PBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBD and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer