PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBD vs. PSILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBD vs. PSILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and T. Rowe Price Spectrum International Equity Fund (PSILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBD achieves a 28.03% return, which is significantly higher than PSILX's 12.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PBD having a 9.10% annualized return and PSILX not far behind at 8.88%.


PBD

1D
0.84%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
28.03%
6M
27.73%
1Y
72.58%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
-5.27%
10Y*
9.10%

PSILX

1D
0.46%
1M
3.76%
YTD
12.26%
6M
14.02%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBD vs. PSILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
28.03%43.65%-26.39%-10.69%-29.70%-22.30%145.46%40.00%-19.32%28.72%
PSILX
T. Rowe Price Spectrum International Equity Fund
12.26%30.30%4.28%13.83%-18.04%5.00%13.94%25.00%-14.83%26.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PBD and PSILX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2007

0.75

The correlation between PBD and PSILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBD vs. PSILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBD
PBD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PSILX
PSILX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PSILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSILX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PSILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSILX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBD vs. PSILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and T. Rowe Price Spectrum International Equity Fund (PSILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBDPSILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.30

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.71

2.04

+3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.24

7.72

+11.52

PBD vs. PSILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBD Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the PSILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBD and PSILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBD vs. PSILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBD drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than PSILX's maximum drawdown of -61.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBD and PSILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDPSILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.60%

-61.38%

-17.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.78%

-12.72%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.45%

-13.70%

-38.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.15%

-33.13%

-36.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.40%

-33.33%

-42.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.63%

-1.66%

-41.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.37%

-14.05%

-39.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

3.32%

+0.46%

Volatility

PBD vs. PSILX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) has a higher volatility of 10.96% compared to T. Rowe Price Spectrum International Equity Fund (PSILX) at 6.70%. This indicates that PBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBDPSILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.96%

6.70%

+4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.02%

14.03%

+4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.81%

16.33%

+8.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.59%

15.94%

+12.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.35%

16.28%

+11.07%

PBD vs. PSILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PSILX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBD vs. PSILX - Dividend Comparison

PBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than PSILX's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
1.76%2.71%1.81%2.85%2.98%0.67%0.48%1.83%1.86%1.76%2.04%1.24%
PSILX
T. Rowe Price Spectrum International Equity Fund
4.83%5.42%2.04%1.88%6.67%3.49%0.88%3.49%6.69%0.58%0.17%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBD and PSILX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBD has higher volatility (10.96%) compared to PSILX (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBD dropped -78.60% vs PSILX's -61.38%.

PBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBD and PSILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer