PBCKX vs. PLTHX
PBCKX (Principal Blue Chip Fund) and PLTHX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund) are both mutual funds - PBCKX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal, while PLTHX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, PBCKX returned 16.34%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for PLTHX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBCKX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PLTHX.
Performance
PBCKX vs. PLTHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBCKX achieves a -5.15% return, which is significantly lower than PLTHX's 10.63% return. Over the past 10 years, PBCKX has outperformed PLTHX with an annualized return of 16.34%, while PLTHX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.37% annualized return.
PBCKX
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -4.19%
- YTD
- -5.15%
- 6M
- -5.85%
- 1Y
- -1.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
PLTHX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 9.95%
- 1Y
- 25.90%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
PBCKX vs. PLTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund | -5.15% | 9.20% | 26.90% | 40.58% | -30.74% | 25.05% | 34.77% | 45.22% | 2.83% | 28.85% |
PLTHX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund | 10.63% | 19.91% | 17.18% | 20.28% | -18.52% | 20.05% | 16.11% | 26.46% | -9.93% | 21.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBCKX and PLTHX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014 | 0.88 |
The correlation between PBCKX and PLTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBCKX vs. PLTHX — Risk / Return Rank
PBCKX
PLTHX
PBCKX vs. PLTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBCKX | PLTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.39 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 3.15 | -3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.05 | 14.01 | -14.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBCKX vs. PLTHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBCKX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than PLTHX's maximum drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBCKX and PLTHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBCKX | PLTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.00% | -33.26% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.10% | -8.60% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.10% | -16.64% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.00% | -25.49% | -12.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.00% | -33.26% | -4.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.75% | -0.97% | -7.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -4.79% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 1.93% | +4.52% |
Volatility
PBCKX vs. PLTHX - Volatility Comparison
Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) at 5.05%. This indicates that PBCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBCKX | PLTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | 5.05% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 10.44% | +2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 12.70% | +3.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 15.62% | +4.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 16.02% | +4.24% |
PBCKX vs. PLTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBCKX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTHX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBCKX vs. PLTHX - Dividend Comparison
PBCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.03%, more than PLTHX's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund | 21.03% | 19.94% | 9.01% | 0.51% | 0.71% | 6.67% | 3.28% | 8.90% | 7.86% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 2.40% |
PLTHX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund | 3.95% | 4.37% | 4.30% | 2.76% | 7.91% | 3.84% | 2.91% | 3.67% | 3.47% | 2.37% | 2.20% | 1.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBCKX and PLTHX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBCKX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to PLTHX (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBCKX dropped -38.00% vs PLTHX's -33.26%.
PLTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBCKX and PLTHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer