PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAYS vs. SEZL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAYS vs. SEZL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYS achieves a 35.73% return, which is significantly lower than SEZL's 109.06% return.


PAYS

1D
4.48%
1M
19.90%
YTD
35.73%
6M
27.32%
1Y
38.42%
3Y*
39.77%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
43.04%

SEZL

1D
3.00%
1M
29.59%
YTD
109.06%
6M
88.63%
1Y
-5.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAYS vs. SEZL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PAYS
PaySign, Inc.
35.73%70.53%7.86%45.83%
SEZL
Sezzle Inc. Common Stock
109.06%48.89%1,146.59%-9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PAYS and SEZL is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2023

0.28

The correlation between PAYS and SEZL shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAYS:

$426.54M

SEZL:

$4.64B

EPS

PAYS:

$0.17

SEZL:

$4.15

PE Ratio

PAYS:

40.69

SEZL:

32.00

PEG Ratio

PAYS:

0.34

SEZL:

0.06

PS Ratio

PAYS:

4.63

SEZL:

9.87

PB Ratio

PAYS:

7.75

SEZL:

23.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAYS:

$91.47M

SEZL:

$480.91M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAYS:

$46.93M

SEZL:

$426.79M

EBITDA (TTM)

PAYS:

$22.09M

SEZL:

$193.18M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAYS vs. SEZL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYS
PAYS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PAYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAYS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PAYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAYS Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SEZL
SEZL Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SEZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEZL Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SEZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEZL Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAYS vs. SEZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAYSSEZLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.07

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

-0.07

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

-0.10

+1.13

PAYS vs. SEZL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYS Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is higher than the SEZL Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYS and SEZL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAYS vs. SEZL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYS drawdown since its inception was -98.95%, which is greater than SEZL's maximum drawdown of -89.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYS and SEZL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAYSSEZLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.95%

-89.95%

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.85%

-72.02%

+9.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.06%

-27.15%

-33.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.37%

-40.29%

-29.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.19%

53.61%

-16.42%

Volatility

PAYS vs. SEZL - Volatility Comparison

PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) have volatilities of 17.34% and 17.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAYSSEZLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.34%

17.41%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.60%

62.20%

-10.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.57%

87.49%

-14.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.43%

204.57%

-137.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

76.01%

204.57%

-128.56%

Dividends

PAYS vs. SEZL - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAYS nor SEZL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PAYS vs. SEZL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PaySign, Inc. and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M20222023202420252026
28.04M
135.54M
(PAYS) Total Revenue
(SEZL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PAYS vs. SEZL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PaySign, Inc. and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
65.0%
86.3%
Portfolio components
PAYS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported a gross profit of 18.22M and revenue of 28.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.0%.

SEZL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 117.02M and revenue of 135.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.

PAYS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.67M and revenue of 28.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

SEZL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 69.04M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.

PAYS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported a net income of 5.44M and revenue of 28.04M, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.

SEZL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 51.30M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAYS and SEZL have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEZL has higher volatility (17.41%) compared to PAYS (17.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAYS dropped -98.95% vs SEZL's -89.95%.

PAYS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAYS and SEZL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer