PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAYC vs. ISRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAYC vs. ISRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYC achieves a -15.13% return, which is significantly higher than ISRG's -27.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PAYC has underperformed ISRG with an annualized return of 12.79%, while ISRG has yielded a comparatively higher 19.09% annualized return.


PAYC

1D
1.72%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
-15.13%
6M
-18.82%
1Y
-45.87%
3Y*
-24.70%
5Y*
-16.50%
10Y*
12.79%

ISRG

1D
-0.45%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
-27.42%
6M
-24.20%
1Y
-19.87%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
19.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAYC vs. ISRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAYC
Paycom Software, Inc.
-15.13%-21.70%-0.04%-33.06%-25.26%-8.19%70.82%116.22%52.43%76.59%
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
-27.42%8.51%54.72%27.14%-26.15%31.76%38.39%23.43%31.23%72.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PAYC and ISRG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2014

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between PAYC and ISRG has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAYC:

$6.89B

ISRG:

$147.90B

EPS

PAYC:

$8.58

ISRG:

$8.24

PE Ratio

PAYC:

15.68

ISRG:

49.88

PEG Ratio

PAYC:

0.59

ISRG:

3.05

PS Ratio

PAYC:

3.52

ISRG:

14.04

PB Ratio

PAYC:

8.49

ISRG:

8.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAYC:

$2.09B

ISRG:

$10.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAYC:

$1.70B

ISRG:

$7.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

PAYC:

$803.80M

ISRG:

$3.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAYC vs. ISRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYC
PAYC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PAYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAYC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PAYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

ISRG
ISRG Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ISRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISRG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ISRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISRG Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAYC vs. ISRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAYCISRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.90

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

-0.62

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

-1.24

-0.09

PAYC vs. ISRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYC Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the ISRG Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYC and ISRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAYC vs. ISRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYC drawdown since its inception was -78.99%, roughly equal to the maximum ISRG drawdown of -82.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYC and ISRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAYCISRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.99%

-82.26%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.59%

-32.14%

-21.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.70%

-34.10%

-34.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.99%

-49.90%

-29.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.99%

-49.90%

-29.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.06%

-32.66%

-42.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.21%

-21.28%

-5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.24%

16.00%

+19.24%

Volatility

PAYC vs. ISRG - Volatility Comparison

Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) at 9.70%. This indicates that PAYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAYCISRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.21%

9.70%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.11%

20.72%

+9.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.80%

30.69%

+7.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.48%

33.19%

+11.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.50%

32.40%

+12.10%

Dividends

PAYC vs. ISRG - Dividend Comparison

PAYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while ISRG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAYC
Paycom Software, Inc.
1.12%0.94%0.73%0.54%

Financials

PAYC vs. ISRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Paycom Software, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
571.90M
2.77B
(PAYC) Total Revenue
(ISRG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PAYC vs. ISRG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Paycom Software, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%20222023202420252026
84.7%
66.1%
Portfolio components
PAYC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported a gross profit of 484.60M and revenue of 571.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.7%.

ISRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.83B and revenue of 2.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.1%.

PAYC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported an operating income of 210.20M and revenue of 571.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.8%.

ISRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported an operating income of 855.30M and revenue of 2.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

PAYC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported a net income of 155.70M and revenue of 571.90M, resulting in a net margin of 27.2%.

ISRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported a net income of 821.50M and revenue of 2.77B, resulting in a net margin of 29.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAYC and ISRG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAYC has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to ISRG (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAYC dropped -78.99% vs ISRG's -82.26%.

ISRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAYC and ISRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer