PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAYC vs. FOUR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAYC vs. FOUR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) and Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYC achieves a -21.59% return, which is significantly higher than FOUR's -38.59% return.


PAYC

1D
0.49%
1M
-9.57%
YTD
-21.59%
6M
-21.72%
1Y
-46.15%
3Y*
-25.36%
5Y*
-19.08%
10Y*
12.05%

FOUR

1D
0.26%
1M
-10.57%
YTD
-38.59%
6M
-40.31%
1Y
-58.66%
3Y*
-14.44%
5Y*
-17.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAYC vs. FOUR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PAYC
Paycom Software, Inc.
-21.59%-21.70%-0.04%-33.06%-25.26%-8.19%49.17%
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
-38.59%-39.32%39.60%32.92%-3.45%-23.17%127.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PAYC and FOUR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.46

The correlation between PAYC and FOUR shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAYC:

$6.36B

FOUR:

$2.85B

EPS

PAYC:

$8.58

FOUR:

$1.07

PE Ratio

PAYC:

14.49

FOUR:

36.04

PEG Ratio

PAYC:

0.54

FOUR:

1.46

PS Ratio

PAYC:

3.25

FOUR:

0.93

PB Ratio

PAYC:

7.84

FOUR:

4.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAYC:

$2.09B

FOUR:

$3.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAYC:

$1.70B

FOUR:

$1.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

PAYC:

$803.80M

FOUR:

$503.40M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAYC vs. FOUR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYC
PAYC Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PAYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAYC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PAYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAYC Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FOUR
FOUR Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FOUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOUR Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FOUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOUR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAYC vs. FOUR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) and Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAYCFOURDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.78

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

-0.88

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

-1.40

+0.02

PAYC vs. FOUR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYC Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is comparable to the FOUR Sharpe Ratio of -1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYC and FOUR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAYC vs. FOUR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYC drawdown since its inception was -78.99%, which is greater than FOUR's maximum drawdown of -71.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYC and FOUR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAYCFOURDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.99%

-71.65%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.12%

-66.64%

+14.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.70%

-71.65%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.99%

-71.65%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.96%

-69.23%

-7.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.31%

-31.83%

+4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.42%

41.78%

-8.36%

Volatility

PAYC vs. FOUR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) is 12.71%, while Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) has a volatility of 18.21%. This indicates that PAYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOUR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAYCFOURDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.71%

18.21%

-5.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.42%

47.87%

-17.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.98%

55.46%

-17.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.52%

56.52%

-12.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.52%

57.54%

-13.02%

Dividends

PAYC vs. FOUR - Dividend Comparison

PAYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while FOUR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAYC
Paycom Software, Inc.
1.21%0.94%0.73%0.54%

Financials

PAYC vs. FOUR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Paycom Software, Inc. and Shift4 Payments, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
571.90M
0
(PAYC) Total Revenue
(FOUR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PAYC and FOUR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOUR has higher volatility (18.21%) compared to PAYC (12.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAYC dropped -78.99% vs FOUR's -71.65%.

FOUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.06 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAYC and FOUR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer