PAY vs. RDFN

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

PAY (Paymentus Holdings, Inc.) and RDFN (Redfin Corporation) are both stocks. PAY operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while RDFN operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate). At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PAY vs. RDFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Paymentus Holdings, Inc. (PAY) and Redfin Corporation (RDFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PAY

• 1D: 2.08%
• 1M: -14.36%
• YTD: -33.14%
• 6M: -34.00%
• 1Y: -38.73%
• 3Y*: 27.37%
• 5Y*: -6.85%
• 10Y*: —

RDFN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAY vs. RDFN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PAY Paymentus Holdings, Inc.	-33.14%	-3.31%	82.82%	123.10%	-77.10%	21.63%
RDFN Redfin Corporation	0.00%	42.19%	-23.74%	143.40%	-88.96%	-29.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PAY and RDFN is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021	0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between PAY and RDFN has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) PAY : $1.28B RDFN : $1.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) PAY : $316.55M RDFN : $364.02M
EBITDA (TTM) PAY : $121.90M RDFN : -$129.82M

Return for Risk

PAY vs. RDFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAY

PAY Risk / Return Rank: 10
PAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
PAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
PAY Omega Ratio Rank: 12
PAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
PAY Martin Ratio Rank: 6

RDFN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAY vs. RDFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paymentus Holdings, Inc. (PAY) and Redfin Corporation (RDFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAY	RDFN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.76	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.05	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.53	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PAY	RDFN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.99%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.65%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PAY	RDFN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.31%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.98%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.47%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.30%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.48%	—	—

Dividends

PAY vs. RDFN - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAY nor RDFN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAY and RDFN in my portfolio?

PAY and RDFN have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.