RDFN vs. Z

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Redfin Corporation (RDFN) and Zillow Group, Inc. (Z).

Performance

RDFN vs. Z - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redfin Corporation (RDFN) and Zillow Group, Inc. (Z). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RDFN vs. Z - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RDFN Redfin Corporation	0.00%	42.19%	-23.74%	143.40%	-88.96%	-44.06%	224.65%	46.81%	-54.02%	44.33%
Z Zillow Group, Inc.	-39.34%	-7.87%	27.98%	79.63%	-49.55%	-50.81%	182.54%	45.47%	-22.83%	-9.51%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) RDFN : $1.04B Z : $2.58B
Gross Profit (TTM) RDFN : $364.02M Z : $1.92B
EBITDA (TTM) RDFN : -$129.82M Z : $229.00M

Returns By Period

RDFN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

Z

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -7.26%
• YTD: -39.34%
• 6M: -46.29%
• 1Y: -39.64%
• 3Y*: -2.37%
• 5Y*: -20.87%
• 10Y*: 5.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RDFN vs. Z — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

Z

Z Risk / Return Rank: 10
Z Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
Z Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
Z Omega Ratio Rank: 10
Z Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
Z Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDFN vs. Z - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redfin Corporation (RDFN) and Zillow Group, Inc. (Z). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RDFN	Z	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.07	—

Correlation

The correlation between RDFN and Z is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RDFN vs. Z - Dividend Comparison

Neither RDFN nor Z has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RDFN	Z	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-86.51%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-55.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-81.62%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-86.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-79.30%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-43.84%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.73%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RDFN	Z	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.77%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	35.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	44.59%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	52.38%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	53.07%	—

Financials