PAXGX vs. PXWGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PAXGX (Pax Global Opportunities Fund) and PXWGX (Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund) are both mutual funds - PAXGX is a Global Equities fund managed by Pax World, while PXWGX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Pax World. Over the past 5 years, PAXGX returned 4.89%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for PXWGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PAXGX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for PXWGX.

Performance

PAXGX vs. PXWGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pax Global Opportunities Fund (PAXGX) and Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund (PXWGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXGX achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than PXWGX's 13.32% return.

PAXGX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 4.54%
• YTD: 5.23%
• 6M: 6.52%
• 1Y: 9.41%
• 3Y*: 8.80%
• 5Y*: 4.89%
• 10Y*: —

PXWGX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 8.49%
• YTD: 13.32%
• 6M: 13.69%
• 1Y: 31.40%
• 3Y*: 20.86%
• 5Y*: 13.09%
• 10Y*: 13.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXGX vs. PXWGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PAXGX Pax Global Opportunities Fund	5.23%	9.48%	6.16%	15.16%	-18.86%	18.71%	22.76%	33.52%	-8.20%
PXWGX Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund	13.32%	15.75%	20.64%	24.46%	-18.33%	30.27%	13.35%	27.16%	-4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXGX and PXWGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018	0.90

The correlation between PAXGX and PXWGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PAXGX vs. PXWGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXGX

PAXGX Risk / Return Rank: 9
PAXGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
PAXGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
PAXGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
PAXGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PAXGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

PXWGX

PXWGX Risk / Return Rank: 76
PXWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PXWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
PXWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
PXWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
PXWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXGX vs. PXWGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax Global Opportunities Fund (PAXGX) and Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund (PXWGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAXGX	PXWGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	2.63	-1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	3.55	-2.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.46	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	3.53	-2.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.71	15.55	-12.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAXGX vs. PXWGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the PXWGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXGX and PXWGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAXGX	PXWGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	2.63	-1.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.70	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.40	+0.11

Drawdowns

PAXGX vs. PXWGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXGX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum PXWGX drawdown of -57.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXGX and PXWGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAXGX	PXWGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.63%	-57.59%	+26.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.28%	-9.25%	-3.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.35%	-26.98%	+7.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.37%	-26.98%	-3.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.55%	-14.55%	+8.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	2.10%	+1.48%

Volatility

PAXGX vs. PXWGX - Volatility Comparison

Pax Global Opportunities Fund (PAXGX) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund (PXWGX) at 3.50%. This indicates that PAXGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXWGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAXGX	PXWGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	3.50%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.69%	9.55%	+1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.37%	12.45%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.76%	18.83%	-2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.42%	18.57%	-0.15%

PAXGX vs. PXWGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than PXWGX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAXGX vs. PXWGX - Dividend Comparison

PAXGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than PXWGX's 4.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAXGX Pax Global Opportunities Fund	6.53%	6.87%	2.82%	0.21%	1.30%	1.79%	0.80%	1.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXWGX Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund	4.75%	5.39%	16.28%	5.95%	7.66%	21.85%	1.92%	3.36%	7.95%	4.53%	10.42%	6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAXGX and PXWGX in my portfolio?

PAXGX and PXWGX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAXGX or PXWGX?

PAXGX has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to PXWGX (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAXGX dropped -30.63% vs PXWGX's -57.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXWGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.