PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAXGX vs. PAXBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAXGX vs. PAXBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pax Global Opportunities Fund (PAXGX) and PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXGX achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly higher than PAXBX's 0.32% return.


PAXGX

1D
0.52%
1M
4.54%
YTD
5.23%
6M
6.52%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
8.80%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*

PAXBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.17%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
-0.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXGX vs. PAXBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PAXGX
Pax Global Opportunities Fund
5.23%9.48%6.16%15.16%-18.86%18.71%22.76%33.52%-8.20%
PAXBX
PAX CORE BOND FUND
0.32%6.45%1.04%4.60%-13.60%-1.85%6.92%8.01%1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXGX and PAXBX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.10

Over the past year, PAXGX and PAXBX have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAXGX vs. PAXBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXGX
PAXGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PAXGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXGX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXGX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

PAXBX
PAXBX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PAXBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXGX vs. PAXBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax Global Opportunities Fund (PAXGX) and PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAXGXPAXBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.23

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

1.73

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.71

5.33

-2.62

PAXGX vs. PAXBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the PAXBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXGX and PAXBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAXGXPAXBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

1.31

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

-0.07

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.29

+0.22

Drawdowns

PAXGX vs. PAXBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXGX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, which is greater than PAXBX's maximum drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXGX and PAXBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAXGXPAXBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.63%

-18.88%

-11.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-2.94%

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-6.24%

-13.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.37%

-18.30%

-12.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.66%

+4.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-5.72%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

0.95%

+2.63%

Volatility

PAXGX vs. PAXBX - Volatility Comparison

Pax Global Opportunities Fund (PAXGX) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX) at 1.39%. This indicates that PAXGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAXGXPAXBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

1.39%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.69%

2.77%

+7.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.37%

3.90%

+9.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

5.74%

+11.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

4.81%

+13.61%

PAXGX vs. PAXBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXBX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAXGX vs. PAXBX - Dividend Comparison

PAXGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than PAXBX's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PAXBX
PAX CORE BOND FUND
3.83%3.72%3.22%2.18%1.69%1.51%4.14%2.59%2.37%2.24%0.07%
PAXGX
Pax Global Opportunities Fund
6.53%6.87%2.82%0.21%1.30%1.79%0.80%1.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAXGX and PAXBX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAXGX has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to PAXBX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAXGX dropped -30.63% vs PAXBX's -18.88%.

PAXBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAXGX and PAXBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer