PAXBX vs. MCDWX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX).

PAXBX is managed by Pax World. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. MCDWX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 15, 2020.

Performance

PAXBX vs. MCDWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAXBX vs. MCDWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PAXBX PAX CORE BOND FUND	-0.41%	6.45%	1.04%	4.60%	-13.60%	-1.85%	3.74%
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series	-0.13%	7.57%	4.13%	7.31%	-11.13%	0.01%	8.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXBX achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than MCDWX's -0.13% return.

PAXBX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: -0.41%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 3.28%
• 3Y*: 2.84%
• 5Y*: -0.42%
• 10Y*: —

MCDWX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -1.30%
• YTD: -0.13%
• 6M: 0.99%
• 1Y: 4.63%
• 3Y*: 5.27%
• 5Y*: 1.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXBX vs. MCDWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXBX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than MCDWX's 0.10% expense ratio.

PAXBX

PAX CORE BOND FUND

MCDWX

Manning & Napier Credit Series

Return for Risk

PAXBX vs. MCDWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXBX

PAXBX Risk / Return Rank: 32
PAXBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
PAXBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
PAXBX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
PAXBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
PAXBX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

MCDWX

MCDWX Risk / Return Rank: 76
MCDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MCDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
MCDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
MCDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
MCDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXBX vs. MCDWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAXBX	MCDWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	1.51	-0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	2.12	-0.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.30	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	2.26	-0.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.27	8.14	-3.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAXBX vs. MCDWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the MCDWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXBX and MCDWX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAXBX	MCDWX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	1.51	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	0.37	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.58	-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between PAXBX and MCDWX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PAXBX vs. MCDWX - Dividend Comparison

PAXBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than MCDWX's 4.43% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PAXBX PAX CORE BOND FUND	3.48%	3.72%	3.22%	2.18%	1.69%	1.51%	4.14%	2.59%	2.37%	2.24%	0.07%
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series	4.43%	4.83%	4.41%	4.48%	3.25%	4.45%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PAXBX vs. MCDWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXBX drawdown since its inception was -18.88%, which is greater than MCDWX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXBX and MCDWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAXBX	MCDWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.88%	-15.96%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.77%	-2.20%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.30%	-15.96%	-2.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.35%	-1.63%	-3.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-4.24%	-1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	0.61%	+0.34%

Volatility

PAXBX vs. MCDWX - Volatility Comparison

PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) at 1.42%. This indicates that PAXBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCDWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAXBX	MCDWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	1.42%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.49%	2.00%	+0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.38%	3.31%	+1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.71%	4.62%	+1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.83%	4.41%	+0.42%