PAWZ vs. BITO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO).

PAWZ and BITO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAWZ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FactSet Pet Care Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2018. BITO is an actively managed fund by ProShares. It was launched on Oct 19, 2021.

Performance

PAWZ vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAWZ vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF	-6.00%	1.21%	3.88%	12.47%	-40.08%	-1.62%
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-23.25%	-11.19%	104.45%	137.33%	-63.91%	-31.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAWZ achieves a -6.00% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -23.25% return.

PAWZ

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -10.53%
• YTD: -6.00%
• 6M: -8.19%
• 1Y: -1.00%
• 3Y*: 1.77%
• 5Y*: -6.17%
• 10Y*: —

BITO

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 2.92%
• YTD: -23.25%
• 6M: -41.96%
• 1Y: -21.48%
• 3Y*: 24.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAWZ vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAWZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.

BITO

ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF

PAWZ

ProShares Pet Care ETF

Return for Risk

PAWZ vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAWZ

PAWZ Risk / Return Rank: 11
PAWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
PAWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
PAWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 10
PAWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
PAWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 11

BITO

BITO Risk / Return Rank: 5
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAWZ vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAWZ	BITO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	-0.48	+0.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.05	-0.43	+0.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.95	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.05	-0.46	+0.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.12	-0.97	+0.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAWZ vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAWZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is higher than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAWZ and BITO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAWZ	BITO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05	-0.48	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	-0.08	+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between PAWZ and BITO is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PAWZ vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

PAWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than BITO's 84.71% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF	0.81%	0.81%	0.63%	0.44%	0.54%	0.18%	0.14%	0.35%	0.07%
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	84.71%	78.29%	61.59%	15.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PAWZ vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAWZ drawdown since its inception was -50.07%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAWZ and BITO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAWZ	BITO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.07%	-77.86%	+27.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.80%	-50.05%	+34.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.47%	-47.07%	+9.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.18%	-36.56%	+14.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.52%	23.55%	-17.03%

Volatility

PAWZ vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) is 5.42%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 12.89%. This indicates that PAWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAWZ	BITO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.42%	12.89%	-7.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.51%	36.69%	-26.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.36%	45.35%	-26.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.07%	55.79%	-35.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.73%	55.79%	-34.06%