PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAVE vs. ZAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PAVE vs. ZAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PAVE vs. ZAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
6.32%19.36%-0.81%
ZAP
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF
10.67%21.84%1.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly lower than ZAP's 10.67% return.


PAVE

1D
3.29%
1M
-7.77%
YTD
6.32%
6M
7.40%
1Y
35.92%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*

ZAP

1D
1.20%
1M
-3.57%
YTD
10.67%
6M
9.86%
1Y
33.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PAVE vs. ZAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than ZAP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PAVE vs. ZAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ZAP
ZAP Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ZAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE vs. ZAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAVEZAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

2.07

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.30

2.71

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.99

-1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.73

11.91

-1.19

PAVE vs. ZAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the ZAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE and ZAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAVEZAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.07

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.69

-1.06

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE and ZAP is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PAVE vs. ZAP - Dividend Comparison

PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than ZAP's 1.64% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.86%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%
ZAP
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF
1.64%1.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PAVE vs. ZAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than ZAP's maximum drawdown of -12.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and ZAP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PAVEZAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-12.38%

-31.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-8.59%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.70%

-3.71%

-4.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-2.67%

-3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

2.88%

+0.51%

Volatility

PAVE vs. ZAP - Volatility Comparison

Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) at 5.40%. This indicates that PAVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PAVEZAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.74%

5.40%

+2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.97%

10.77%

+3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.40%

16.07%

+6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

16.55%

+4.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.41%

16.55%

+7.86%