PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAVE vs. DTCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAVE vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 22.22% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 47.11% return.


PAVE

1D
1.04%
1M
6.32%
YTD
22.22%
6M
19.45%
1Y
36.66%
3Y*
25.73%
5Y*
18.54%
10Y*

DTCR

1D
-1.40%
1M
1.87%
YTD
47.11%
6M
48.06%
1Y
67.40%
3Y*
34.83%
5Y*
14.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
22.22%19.36%17.92%31.01%-7.17%36.42%24.73%
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
47.11%28.99%14.92%18.93%-30.89%20.35%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE and DTCR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.55

The correlation between PAVE and DTCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAVE vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAVEDTCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.47

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

5.25

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.23

16.15

-4.91

PAVE vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE and DTCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAVE vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than DTCR's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and DTCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAVEDTCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-38.98%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-12.89%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.23%

-24.96%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

-38.98%

+12.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-4.37%

+2.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-12.27%

+6.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

4.19%

-0.92%

Volatility

PAVE vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) is 7.04%, while Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) has a volatility of 9.83%. This indicates that PAVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAVEDTCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.04%

9.83%

-2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.92%

18.53%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

23.31%

-3.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

22.16%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.39%

22.10%

+2.29%

PAVE vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than DTCR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAVE vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, which matches DTCR's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.75%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.75%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAVE and DTCR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTCR has higher volatility (9.83%) compared to PAVE (7.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs DTCR's -38.98%.

On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 18.54% vs 14.30% for DTCR. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 7.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 18.54% return vs 14.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DTCR.

PAVE and DTCR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.75%.

PAVE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while DTCR is REIT. PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.50% for DTCR.

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAVE and DTCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer