PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAVE vs. DFNG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAVE vs. DFNG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PAVE is traded in USD, while DFNG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DFNG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 20.86% return, which is significantly higher than DFNG.L's 0.98% return.


PAVE

1D
1.01%
1M
2.28%
YTD
20.86%
6M
18.50%
1Y
36.91%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*

DFNG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.98%
6M
2.42%
1Y
12.83%
3Y*
40.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE vs. DFNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
20.86%19.36%17.92%24.30%
DFNG.L
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP
0.98%68.35%43.76%1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE and DFNG.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2023

0.40

The correlation between PAVE and DFNG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAVE vs. DFNG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DFNG.L
DFNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE vs. DFNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAVEDFNG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.10

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

0.65

+2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.32

1.61

+9.71

PAVE vs. DFNG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE and DFNG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAVE vs. DFNG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than DFNG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and DFNG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAVEDFNG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-22.14%

-21.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-19.94%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.23%

-19.94%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-17.31%

+16.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-5.10%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

7.98%

-4.71%

Volatility

PAVE vs. DFNG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) is 7.35%, while VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) has a volatility of 8.63%. This indicates that PAVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAVEDFNG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.35%

8.63%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.87%

20.09%

-4.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.49%

25.35%

-5.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.70%

24.31%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.40%

24.31%

+0.09%

PAVE vs. DFNG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than DFNG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAVE vs. DFNG.L - Dividend Comparison

PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while DFNG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFNG.L
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.76%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAVE and DFNG.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNG.L.

PAVE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while DFNG.L is Aerospace & Defense. PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while DFNG.L tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.55% for DFNG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAVE and DFNG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer