PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAVE vs. AIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAVE vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 20.55% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 33.84% return.


PAVE

1D
0.56%
1M
0.42%
YTD
20.55%
6M
19.00%
1Y
37.89%
3Y*
27.31%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*

AIQ

1D
-1.58%
1M
16.50%
YTD
33.84%
6M
33.72%
1Y
64.95%
3Y*
36.88%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
20.55%19.36%17.92%31.01%-7.17%36.42%19.72%33.26%-18.52%
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
33.84%31.89%24.11%55.39%-36.44%17.09%52.88%39.94%-14.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE and AIQ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.61

The correlation between PAVE and AIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PAVE vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PAVE
AIQ

Industrials

74.8%
4.2%

Basic Materials

20.3%

-

Utilities

3.2%

-

Technology

1.1%
73.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%

-

Energy

0.2%

-

Communication Services

-

13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.5%

Financial Services

-

0.4%

Healthcare

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

PAVE
74.8%
AIQ
4.2%

Basic Materials

PAVE
20.3%
AIQ

-

Utilities

PAVE
3.2%
AIQ

-

Technology

PAVE
1.1%
AIQ
73.3%

Consumer Defensive

PAVE
0.3%
AIQ

-

Energy

PAVE
0.2%
AIQ

-

Communication Services

PAVE

-

AIQ
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PAVE

-

AIQ
8.5%

Financial Services

PAVE

-

AIQ
0.4%

Healthcare

PAVE

-

AIQ
0.4%

Real Estate

PAVE

-

AIQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAVE vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAVEAIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.46

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.96

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.72

13.69

-1.96

PAVE vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAVEAIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.83

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.74

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.83

-0.14

Drawdowns

PAVE vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, roughly equal to the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and AIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAVEAIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-44.66%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-16.47%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.23%

-26.35%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

-44.66%

+18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-2.95%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-9.79%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

4.76%

-1.52%

Volatility

PAVE vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) is 6.10%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 8.82%. This indicates that PAVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAVEAIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

8.82%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.18%

18.55%

-3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.80%

23.11%

-4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.60%

25.34%

-3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.38%

25.50%

-1.12%

PAVE vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAVE vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.14%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%0.00%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.76%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAVE and AIQ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIQ has higher volatility (8.82%) compared to PAVE (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 18.69% vs 17.52% for PAVE. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 18.69% return vs 17.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.

PAVE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.68% for AIQ.

AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAVE and AIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer