PAUG vs. MMAX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX).

PAUG and MMAX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAUG is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index. It was launched on Aug 1, 2019. MMAX is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Mar 31, 2025.

Performance

PAUG vs. MMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAUG vs. MMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August	-1.23%	14.21%
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF	1.32%	5.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAUG achieves a -1.23% return, which is significantly lower than MMAX's 1.32% return.

PAUG

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: -1.23%
• 6M: 0.59%
• 1Y: 13.08%
• 3Y*: 13.14%
• 5Y*: 8.07%
• 10Y*: —

MMAX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 3.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAUG vs. MMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.

PAUG

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August

MMAX

iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF

Return for Risk

PAUG vs. MMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAUG

PAUG Risk / Return Rank: 79
PAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
PAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAUG vs. MMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAUG	MMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAUG	MMAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	2.82	-2.01

Correlation

The correlation between PAUG and MMAX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PAUG vs. MMAX - Dividend Comparison

PAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF	1.30%	1.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PAUG vs. MMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAUG drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, which is greater than MMAX's maximum drawdown of -1.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAUG and MMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAUG	MMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.88%	-1.93%	-15.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.31%	0.00%	-2.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-0.11%	-1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.24%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PAUG	MMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.41%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.14%	2.61%	+7.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.67%	2.61%	+6.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.71%	2.61%	+8.10%