PAUG vs. JSMD
PAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August) and JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAUG is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index, while JSMD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAUG returned 9.23%/yr vs 8.38%/yr for JSMD. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAUG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JSMD.
Performance
PAUG vs. JSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAUG achieves a 5.25% return, which is significantly lower than JSMD's 19.55% return.
PAUG
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 15.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- —
JSMD
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 17.80%
- 1Y
- 31.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
PAUG vs. JSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August | 5.25% | 12.34% | 15.37% | 17.71% | -6.85% | 7.58% | 9.82% | 3.60% |
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 19.55% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -22.84% | 8.40% | 30.79% | 5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAUG and JSMD is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019 | 0.77 |
The correlation between PAUG and JSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
PAUG vs. JSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAUG
JSMD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PAUG
JSMD
Financial Services
PAUG
JSMD
Communication Services
PAUG
JSMD
Consumer Cyclical
PAUG
JSMD
Healthcare
PAUG
JSMD
Industrials
PAUG
JSMD
Consumer Defensive
PAUG
JSMD
Energy
PAUG
JSMD
Utilities
PAUG
JSMD
-
Real Estate
PAUG
JSMD
Basic Materials
PAUG
JSMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAUG vs. JSMD — Risk / Return Rank
PAUG
JSMD
PAUG vs. JSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAUG | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.26 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 2.16 | +1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.35 | 7.31 | +14.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAUG vs. JSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAUG drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum JSMD drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAUG and JSMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAUG | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.88% | -38.98% | +21.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.96% | -14.86% | +10.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.45% | -24.01% | +13.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.76% | -32.18% | +20.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -7.46% | +5.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 4.38% | -3.66% |
Volatility
PAUG vs. JSMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) is 1.01%, while Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that PAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAUG | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 8.24% | -7.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.26% | 17.21% | -12.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.55% | 21.80% | -16.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.72% | 22.99% | -14.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 22.83% | -12.25% |
PAUG vs. JSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JSMD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAUG vs. JSMD - Dividend Comparison
PAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.46% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% |
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAUG and JSMD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSMD has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to PAUG (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAUG dropped -17.88% vs JSMD's -38.98%.
On 5-year performance, PAUG leads with 9.23% vs 8.38% for JSMD. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAUG has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PAUG.
JSMD has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for PAUG.
PAUG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while JSMD is Mid Cap Growth Equities. PAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index, while JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PAUG and 0.30% for JSMD.
PAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAUG and JSMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer