PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PATN vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PATN vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PATN achieves a 28.74% return, which is significantly higher than SRVR's 9.97% return.


PATN

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.34%
6M
17.25%
YTD
28.74%
1Y
53.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.65%

SRVR

1D
1.07%
1M
0.22%
6M
3.30%
YTD
9.97%
1Y
1.51%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
-2.93%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.30M$4.83M$3.83M
$2.07M$2.11M$2.68M

PATN vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PATN
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
28.74%40.01%-1.73%
SRVR
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF
9.97%-1.99%-5.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PATN and SRVR is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024

0.53

The correlation between PATN and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PATN vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PATN
PATN Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PATN vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PATNSRVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.03

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

0.10

+3.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

0.24

+11.42

PATN vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PATN Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PATN and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PATN vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PATN drawdown since its inception was -16.77%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATN and SRVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PATNSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.77%

-40.99%

+24.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.40%

-15.01%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.34%

-19.47%

+10.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-15.30%

+11.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

6.23%

-1.65%

Volatility

PATN vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) at 5.03%. This indicates that PATN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PATNSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

5.03%

+3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.85%

14.17%

+8.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.38%

17.46%

+7.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.70%

19.90%

+2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.70%

21.39%

+1.31%

PATN vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PATN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PATN vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

PATN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than SRVR's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PATN
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
1.69%2.25%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRVR
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF
2.78%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


PATN and SRVR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PATN has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to SRVR (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATN dropped -16.77% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 53.28% vs 1.51% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 53.28% return vs 1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRVR is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.69% for PATN.

PATN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SRVR is REIT. PATN tracks Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index, while SRVR tracks FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PATN and 0.49% for SRVR.

PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PATN and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer