PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PATH vs. SPWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PATH vs. SPWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UiPath Inc. (PATH) and SP Funds S&P World (ex-US) ETF (SPWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PATH achieves a -37.10% return, which is significantly lower than SPWO's 23.45% return.


PATH

1D
1.48%
1M
-5.67%
YTD
-37.10%
6M
-39.92%
1Y
-17.59%
3Y*
-13.14%
5Y*
-31.78%
10Y*

SPWO

1D
0.42%
1M
2.43%
YTD
23.45%
6M
22.92%
1Y
40.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PATH vs. SPWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PATH
UiPath Inc.
-37.10%28.95%-48.83%-5.41%
SPWO
SP Funds S&P World (ex-US) ETF
23.45%26.32%9.25%1.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PATH and SPWO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2023

0.36

The correlation between PATH and SPWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PATH vs. SPWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PATH
PATH Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PATH Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PATH Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SPWO
SPWO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PATH vs. SPWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UiPath Inc. (PATH) and SP Funds S&P World (ex-US) ETF (SPWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PATHSPWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.34

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

2.98

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

11.04

-11.63

PATH vs. SPWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PATH Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the SPWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PATH and SPWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PATH vs. SPWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PATH drawdown since its inception was -88.98%, which is greater than SPWO's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATH and SPWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PATHSPWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.98%

-18.03%

-70.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.37%

-13.75%

-37.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.89%

-4.33%

-83.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.81%

-2.81%

-71.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.71%

3.71%

+26.00%

Volatility

PATH vs. SPWO - Volatility Comparison

UiPath Inc. (PATH) has a higher volatility of 16.68% compared to SP Funds S&P World (ex-US) ETF (SPWO) at 11.03%. This indicates that PATH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PATHSPWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.68%

11.03%

+5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.37%

19.15%

+23.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.60%

21.87%

+41.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.46%

19.88%

+43.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.04%

19.88%

+44.16%

Dividends

PATH vs. SPWO - Dividend Comparison

PATH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.


PositionTTM20252024
PATH
UiPath Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPWO
SP Funds S&P World (ex-US) ETF
1.05%1.29%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


PATH and SPWO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PATH has higher volatility (16.68%) compared to SPWO (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATH dropped -88.98% vs SPWO's -18.03%.

SPWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PATH and SPWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer