PASIX vs. QGRPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PASIX (PACE Alternative Strategies Investments) and QGRPX (UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund) are both mutual funds - PASIX is a Multistrategy fund managed by UBS, while QGRPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by UBS. Over the past 5 years, PASIX returned 4.53%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for QGRPX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PASIX charges 1.88%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for QGRPX.

Performance

PASIX vs. QGRPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Alternative Strategies Investments (PASIX) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PASIX having a 4.04% return and QGRPX slightly higher at 4.11%.

PASIX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 4.04%
• 6M: 4.07%
• 1Y: 8.80%
• 3Y*: 8.02%
• 5Y*: 4.53%
• 10Y*: 3.95%

QGRPX

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: 4.11%
• 6M: 3.50%
• 1Y: 17.94%
• 3Y*: 20.49%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PASIX vs. QGRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PASIX PACE Alternative Strategies Investments	4.04%	7.47%	6.56%	4.97%	0.22%	2.60%	7.56%
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund	4.11%	15.51%	25.13%	35.52%	-25.57%	29.14%	14.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PASIX and QGRPX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020	0.57

The correlation between PASIX and QGRPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PASIX vs. QGRPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PASIX

PASIX Risk / Return Rank: 53
PASIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PASIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PASIX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
PASIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
PASIX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

QGRPX

QGRPX Risk / Return Rank: 19
QGRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
QGRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
QGRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
QGRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
QGRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PASIX vs. QGRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Alternative Strategies Investments (PASIX) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PASIX	QGRPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.39	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	1.99	+1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.25	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	1.16	+1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.77	3.68	+7.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PASIX vs. QGRPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PASIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the QGRPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PASIX and QGRPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PASIX	QGRPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	1.39	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	0.65	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.78	-0.39

Drawdowns

PASIX vs. QGRPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PASIX drawdown since its inception was -32.27%, which is greater than QGRPX's maximum drawdown of -30.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PASIX and QGRPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PASIX	QGRPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.27%	-30.28%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.36%	-17.45%	+14.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.01%	-21.03%	+17.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.81%	-30.28%	+25.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-10.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.61%	+0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.32%	-7.56%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	5.29%	-4.44%

Volatility

PASIX vs. QGRPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PACE Alternative Strategies Investments (PASIX) is 1.53%, while UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) has a volatility of 3.16%. This indicates that PASIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PASIX	QGRPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.53%	3.16%	-1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.84%	11.75%	-7.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.50%	14.54%	-10.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.06%	19.60%	-14.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.04%	19.29%	-14.25%

PASIX vs. QGRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PASIX has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRPX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PASIX vs. QGRPX - Dividend Comparison

PASIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.51%, more than QGRPX's 5.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PASIX PACE Alternative Strategies Investments	10.51%	10.93%	7.96%	3.57%	2.42%	6.45%	4.82%	0.00%	2.89%	0.00%	0.00%	2.14%
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund	5.92%	6.16%	3.62%	0.42%	1.00%	2.84%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PASIX and QGRPX in my portfolio?

PASIX and QGRPX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PASIX or QGRPX?

QGRPX has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to PASIX (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PASIX dropped -32.27% vs QGRPX's -30.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PASIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.