PASIX vs. PCLCX
Compare and contrast key facts about PACE Alternative Strategies Investments (PASIX) and PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX).
PASIX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Apr 9, 2006. PCLCX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 24, 1995.
Performance
PASIX vs. PCLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PASIX vs. PCLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PASIX PACE Alternative Strategies Investments | -0.69% | 7.47% | 6.56% | 4.97% | 0.22% | 2.60% | 9.48% | 6.08% | -5.41% | 3.71% |
PCLCX PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments | -12.90% | 9.86% | 28.05% | 35.17% | -28.18% | 20.18% | 39.70% | 31.99% | -3.18% | 29.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PASIX achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly higher than PCLCX's -12.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PASIX has underperformed PCLCX with an annualized return of 3.43%, while PCLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return.
PASIX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 3.43%
PCLCX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -8.67%
- YTD
- -12.90%
- 6M
- -14.31%
- 1Y
- 2.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PASIX vs. PCLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PASIX has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLCX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PASIX vs. PCLCX — Risk / Return Rank
PASIX
PCLCX
PASIX vs. PCLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Alternative Strategies Investments (PASIX) and PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PASIX | PCLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 0.16 | +1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 0.37 | +1.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.05 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | -0.14 | +1.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | -0.41 | +7.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PASIX | PCLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.16 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.20 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.42 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.35 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between PASIX and PCLCX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PASIX vs. PCLCX - Dividend Comparison
PASIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.01%, less than PCLCX's 23.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PASIX PACE Alternative Strategies Investments | 11.01% | 10.93% | 7.96% | 3.57% | 2.42% | 6.45% | 4.82% | 0.00% | 2.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.14% |
PCLCX PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments | 23.71% | 20.66% | 11.94% | 2.09% | 60.17% | 22.81% | 18.38% | 16.53% | 22.05% | 10.32% | 3.30% | 17.60% |
Drawdowns
PASIX vs. PCLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PASIX drawdown since its inception was -32.27%, smaller than the maximum PCLCX drawdown of -63.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PASIX and PCLCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PASIX | PCLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.27% | -63.98% | +31.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.36% | -17.06% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.22% | -38.81% | +33.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.50% | -38.81% | +28.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -17.06% | +13.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.37% | -20.42% | +14.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 5.84% | -5.07% |
Volatility
PASIX vs. PCLCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PACE Alternative Strategies Investments (PASIX) is 2.26%, while PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments (PCLCX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that PASIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PASIX | PCLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 4.64% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.59% | 10.72% | -7.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.46% | 19.41% | -14.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 36.94% | -31.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 30.96% | -25.95% |