PAPR vs. PDEC
PAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April) and PDEC (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - PAPR tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index while PDEC tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAPR returned 8.26%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for PDEC. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
PAPR vs. PDEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAPR achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly higher than PDEC's 4.77% return.
PAPR
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 14.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- —
PDEC
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- —
PAPR vs. PDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 7.18% | 6.58% | 12.28% | 16.45% | -4.29% | 7.51% | 4.62% | 1.10% |
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December | 4.77% | 12.91% | 9.46% | 17.43% | -5.95% | 9.59% | 8.45% | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAPR and PDEC is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PAPR and PDEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
PAPR vs. PDEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAPR
PDEC
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PAPR
PDEC
Financial Services
PAPR
PDEC
Communication Services
PAPR
PDEC
Consumer Cyclical
PAPR
PDEC
Healthcare
PAPR
PDEC
Industrials
PAPR
PDEC
Consumer Defensive
PAPR
PDEC
Energy
PAPR
PDEC
Utilities
PAPR
PDEC
Real Estate
PAPR
PDEC
Basic Materials
PAPR
PDEC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAPR vs. PDEC — Risk / Return Rank
PAPR
PDEC
PAPR vs. PDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAPR | PDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.06 | 1.48 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.50 | 3.49 | +14.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 77.47 | 18.03 | +59.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAPR | PDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.34 | 2.45 | +1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.95 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.80 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
PAPR vs. PDEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAPR drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum PDEC drawdown of -19.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAPR and PDEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAPR | PDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -19.31% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.83% | -4.78% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.87% | -10.77% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.87% | -11.53% | -0.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -1.09% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -2.02% | +0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.19% | 0.92% | -0.73% |
Volatility
PAPR vs. PDEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) is 1.05%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) has a volatility of 1.46%. This indicates that PAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAPR | PDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 1.46% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.55% | 5.06% | -2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36% | 6.83% | -3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 8.91% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.44% | 10.96% | -1.52% |
PAPR vs. PDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PAPR and PDEC have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
PAPR vs. PDEC - Dividend Comparison
Neither PAPR nor PDEC has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.07% |
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAPR and PDEC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDEC has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to PAPR (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAPR dropped -15.31% vs PDEC's -19.31%.
On 5-year performance, PDEC leads with 8.41% vs 8.26% for PAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PDEC has performed better with a 8.41% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAPR and PDEC have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
PAPR and PDEC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index, while PDEC tracks S&P 500.
PAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.34 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAPR and PDEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer