PAPI vs. GOOP
PAPI (Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF) and GOOP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PAPI returned 12.39% vs 93.82% for GOOP. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAPI charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOOP.
Performance
PAPI vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAPI achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than GOOP's 12.36% return.
PAPI
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 12.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOP
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- 12.36%
- 6M
- 10.67%
- 1Y
- 93.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAPI vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PAPI Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.81% | 6.33% | 8.90% | 5.27% |
GOOP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF | 12.36% | 52.46% | 27.67% | 6.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAPI and GOOP is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAPI vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank
PAPI
GOOP
PAPI vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAPI | GOOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.57 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 4.04 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 15.39 | -10.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAPI | GOOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 3.34 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 1.51 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
PAPI vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAPI drawdown since its inception was -14.27%, smaller than the maximum GOOP drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAPI and GOOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAPI | GOOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.27% | -27.49% | +13.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.86% | -23.32% | +16.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.06% | -11.90% | +6.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -6.29% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 6.12% | -3.59% |
Volatility
PAPI vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) is 2.23%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) has a volatility of 9.14%. This indicates that PAPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAPI | GOOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.23% | 9.14% | -6.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.00% | 22.59% | -15.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.55% | 28.30% | -17.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 25.91% | -14.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 25.91% | -14.15% |
PAPI vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAPI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOP's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAPI vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison
PAPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, less than GOOP's 12.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF | 12.25% | 11.79% | 13.73% | 2.06% |
PAPI Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.62% | 7.59% | 7.07% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAPI and GOOP have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOP has higher volatility (9.14%) compared to PAPI (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAPI dropped -14.27% vs GOOP's -27.49%.
On 1-year performance, GOOP leads with 93.82% vs 12.39% for PAPI. On fees, PAPI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PAPI has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOP has performed better with a 93.82% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAPI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOP.
GOOP has the higher dividend yield at 12.25%, compared with 7.62% for PAPI.
They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PAPI and 0.99% for GOOP.
GOOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAPI and GOOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer