PAOFX vs. PRWCX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund (PAOFX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX).
PAOFX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Aug 19, 2013. PRWCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986.
Performance
PAOFX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAOFX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAOFX T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund | -0.99% | 17.86% | 13.37% | 19.70% | -19.27% | 16.11% | 17.65% | 23.85% | -7.37% | 19.79% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | -3.22% | 20.92% | 12.50% | 18.85% | -12.00% | 18.45% | 18.13% | 24.62% | 0.63% | 15.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAOFX achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly higher than PRWCX's -3.22% return. Over the past 10 years, PAOFX has underperformed PRWCX with an annualized return of 9.75%, while PRWCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.
PAOFX
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 16.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
PRWCX
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAOFX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAOFX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAOFX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank
PAOFX
PRWCX
PAOFX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund (PAOFX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAOFX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 1.27 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 2.37 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 2.34 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | 9.70 | -4.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAOFX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.27 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.70 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.88 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.90 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAOFX and PRWCX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PAOFX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison
PAOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than PRWCX's 16.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAOFX T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund | 4.67% | 4.62% | 2.43% | 2.48% | 5.30% | 3.47% | 2.61% | 4.21% | 5.34% | 2.31% | 2.31% | 2.44% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | 16.24% | 15.72% | 10.38% | 4.15% | 9.44% | 9.23% | 7.97% | 5.83% | 7.46% | 6.82% | 3.51% | 9.86% |
Drawdowns
PAOFX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAOFX drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, smaller than the maximum PRWCX drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAOFX and PRWCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAOFX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.94% | -41.77% | +10.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.09% | -6.80% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.78% | -17.07% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.94% | -26.86% | -4.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.92% | -4.47% | -2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -3.34% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 1.64% | +1.09% |
Volatility
PAOFX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund (PAOFX) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 3.64%. This indicates that PAOFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAOFX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 3.64% | +2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 9.78% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.57% | 13.57% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 13.24% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 12.98% | +1.66% |