PALL vs. ASCI
PALL (abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF) and ASCI (abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PALL is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt), while ASCI is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by abrdn. PALL is passively managed, while ASCI is actively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PALL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ASCI.
Performance
PALL vs. ASCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALL achieves a -20.11% return, which is significantly lower than ASCI's 3.57% return.
PALL
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- 6M
- -24.51%
- YTD
- -20.11%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- 0.52%
- 5Y*
- -14.08%
- 10Y*
- 5.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.05%
ASCI
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $161.45K | $105.04K | $93.90K | |
| $12.54M | $14.21M | $19.69M |
PALL vs. ASCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PALL abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF | -20.11% | 9.62% |
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 3.57% | 1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PALL and ASCI is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PALL vs. ASCI — Risk / Return Rank
PALL
ASCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PALL vs. ASCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PALL | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PALL vs. ASCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALL drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, which is greater than ASCI's maximum drawdown of -11.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALL and ASCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALL | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -11.22% | -62.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.63% | -6.31% | -54.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.13% | -2.90% | -24.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.01% | — | — |
Volatility
PALL vs. ASCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PALL | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.62% | 19.19% | +31.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.62% | 19.19% | +23.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.19% | 19.19% | +19.00% |
PALL vs. ASCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PALL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ASCI's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
PALL vs. ASCI - Dividend Comparison
PALL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 0.77% | 0.80% |
PALL abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PALL and ASCI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PALL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PALL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ASCI.
ASCI has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for PALL.
PALL is categorized as Precious Metals, while ASCI is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PALL and 0.70% for ASCI.
Find the right allocation for PALL and ASCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer