PALL vs. AMUN
PALL (abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF) and AMUN (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PALL is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt), while AMUN is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by abrdn. PALL is passively managed, while AMUN is actively managed. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PALL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMUN.
Performance
PALL vs. AMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALL achieves a -20.11% return, which is significantly lower than AMUN's 1.48% return.
PALL
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- 6M
- -24.51%
- YTD
- -20.11%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- 0.52%
- 5Y*
- -14.08%
- 10Y*
- 5.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.05%
AMUN
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.67K | $39.49K | $71.65K | |
| $12.54M | $14.21M | $19.69M |
PALL vs. AMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PALL abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF | -20.11% | 9.62% |
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.48% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between PALL and AMUN is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PALL vs. AMUN — Risk / Return Rank
PALL
AMUN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PALL vs. AMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PALL | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PALL vs. AMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALL drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, which is greater than AMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALL and AMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALL | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -0.61% | -73.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.63% | 0.00% | -60.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.13% | -0.07% | -27.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.01% | — | — |
Volatility
PALL vs. AMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PALL | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.62% | 0.94% | +49.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.62% | 0.94% | +41.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.19% | 0.94% | +37.25% |
PALL vs. AMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PALL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AMUN's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PALL vs. AMUN - Dividend Comparison
PALL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 2.13% | 0.66% |
PALL abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PALL and AMUN have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMUN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMUN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PALL.
AMUN has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.00% for PALL.
PALL is categorized as Precious Metals, while AMUN is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PALL and 0.25% for AMUN.
Find the right allocation for PALL and AMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer