PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMUN vs. AGEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMUN vs. AGEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN) and abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUN achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly lower than AGEM's 34.43% return.


AMUN

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.21%
6M
1.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AGEM

1D
0.62%
1M
8.57%
YTD
34.43%
6M
35.79%
1Y
64.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMUN vs. AGEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMUN and AGEM is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMUN vs. AGEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AGEM
AGEM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AGEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AGEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMUN vs. AGEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN) and abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMUNAGEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.46

AMUN vs. AGEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMUN vs. AGEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUN drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, smaller than the maximum AGEM drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUN and AGEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMUNAGEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-15.58%

+14.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-2.29%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

Volatility

AMUN vs. AGEM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMUNAGEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98%

21.99%

-21.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.98%

22.53%

-21.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.98%

22.53%

-21.55%

AMUN vs. AGEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AGEM's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMUN vs. AGEM - Dividend Comparison

AMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than AGEM's 1.67% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMUN and AGEM have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMUN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMUN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AGEM.

AMUN has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.67% for AGEM.

AMUN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while AGEM is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMUN and 0.70% for AGEM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMUN and AGEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer