AMUN vs. AGEM

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

AMUN (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF) and AGEM (abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMUN is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by abrdn, while AGEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by abrdn. Both are actively managed. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. AMUN charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for AGEM.

Performance

AMUN vs. AGEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN) and abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUN achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than AGEM's 24.99% return.

AMUN

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.13%
• 6M: 1.17%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AGEM

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: 14.22%
• YTD: 24.99%
• 1Y: 45.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 39.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AGEM abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF	$1.02M	$702.44K	$818.78K
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF	$21.67K	$39.49K	$71.65K

AMUN vs. AGEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF	1.48%	0.14%
AGEM abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF	24.99%	3.24%

Correlation

The correlation between AMUN and AGEM is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

AMUN vs. AGEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMUN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AGEM

AGEM Risk / Return Rank: 80
AGEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
AGEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
AGEM Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AGEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
AGEM Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMUN vs. AGEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN) and abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMUN	AGEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.84	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.45	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.22	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.15	—

Drawdowns

AMUN vs. AGEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUN drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, smaller than the maximum AGEM drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUN and AGEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMUN	AGEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-15.58%	+14.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.03%	+7.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.07%	-2.64%	+2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.41%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMUN	AGEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.55%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	22.39%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94%	24.33%	-23.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.94%	23.59%	-22.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.94%	23.59%	-22.65%

AMUN vs. AGEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AGEM's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMUN vs. AGEM - Dividend Comparison

AMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than AGEM's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AGEM abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF	1.94%	1.80%
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF	2.13%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMUN and AGEM in my portfolio?

AMUN and AGEM have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMUN or AGEM?

On fees, AMUN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMUN or AGEM?

AMUN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AGEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMUN or AGEM?

AMUN has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.94% for AGEM.

What is the main difference between AMUN and AGEM?

AMUN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while AGEM is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMUN and 0.70% for AGEM.