PALC vs. PTNQ
PALC (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) and PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PALC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PALC returned 8.89%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for PTNQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PALC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PTNQ.
Performance
PALC vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALC achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly higher than PTNQ's 9.23% return.
PALC
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- 6M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 1Y
- 17.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- —
PTNQ
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 21.07%
- 3Y*
- 12.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
PALC vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 9.84% | 7.28% | 21.24% | 17.52% | -14.74% | 41.03% | 23.19% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 9.23% | 7.18% | 15.47% | 34.65% | -16.00% | 13.16% | 23.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between PALC and PTNQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.73 |
The correlation between PALC and PTNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PALC vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank
PALC
PTNQ
PALC vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PALC | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 1.80 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | 5.78 | +1.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PALC vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALC drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, smaller than the maximum PTNQ drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALC and PTNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALC | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.45% | -28.07% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -11.76% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.39% | -14.19% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.45% | -18.47% | -5.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.28% | -4.46% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.26% | -5.67% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 3.65% | -1.12% |
Volatility
PALC vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) is 7.42%, while Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a volatility of 8.09%. This indicates that PALC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PALC | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 8.09% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.65% | 14.42% | -2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.04% | 17.86% | -3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 13.56% | +3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 16.53% | +0.74% |
PALC vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PALC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PALC vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison
PALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than PTNQ's 0.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.07% | 1.08% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 1.69% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.81% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PALC and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTNQ has higher volatility (8.09%) compared to PALC (7.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALC dropped -24.45% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.
On 5-year performance, PTNQ leads with 9.93% vs 8.89% for PALC. On fees, PALC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PALC has been the lower-risk option at 7.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTNQ has performed better with a 9.93% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PALC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.
PALC has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.81% for PTNQ.
PALC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. PALC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PALC and 0.65% for PTNQ.
PALC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PALC and PTNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer