PAKRX vs. FRQHX
PAKRX (T. Rowe Price Target 2030 Fund) and FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PAKRX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FRQHX.
Performance
PAKRX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PAKRX
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 7.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.12%
FRQHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PAKRX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAKRX T. Rowe Price Target 2030 Fund | 5.93% | 12.52% | 9.22% | 13.85% | -15.44% | 11.09% | 13.88% | 5.42% |
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 | 3.71% | 10.01% | 4.68% | 8.75% | -12.22% | 4.04% | 9.80% | 3.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAKRX and FRQHX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019 | 0.81 |
The correlation between PAKRX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAKRX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank
PAKRX
FRQHX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PAKRX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2030 Fund (PAKRX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAKRX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAKRX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAKRX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | — | — |
Volatility
PAKRX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAKRX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.49% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.27% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.90% | — | — |
PAKRX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAKRX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAKRX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison
PAKRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, more than FRQHX's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 | 2.93% | 3.20% | 3.20% | 2.95% | 5.25% | 6.22% | 3.70% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAKRX T. Rowe Price Target 2030 Fund | 6.76% | 7.16% | 4.31% | 3.54% | 6.16% | 3.54% | 2.99% | 3.62% | 5.26% | 1.90% | 1.79% | 1.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAKRX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PAKRX and FRQHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer