PAKRX vs. SPHD
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Target 2030 Fund (PAKRX) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD).
PAKRX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Aug 19, 2013. SPHD is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Low Volatility High Dividend index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012.
Performance
PAKRX vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAKRX vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAKRX T. Rowe Price Target 2030 Fund | -0.47% | 12.52% | 9.22% | 13.85% | -15.44% | 11.09% | 13.88% | 19.12% | -5.51% | 14.63% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.26% | 3.41% | 18.08% | 1.32% | 0.58% | 24.98% | -9.98% | 20.26% | -6.17% | 11.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAKRX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 4.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PAKRX having a 7.19% annualized return and SPHD not far ahead at 7.20%.
PAKRX
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 10.50%
- 3Y*
- 9.97%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
SPHD
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 9.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 7.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAKRX vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAKRX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAKRX vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
PAKRX
SPHD
PAKRX vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2030 Fund (PAKRX) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAKRX | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 0.23 | +1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 0.42 | +1.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.05 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 0.25 | +1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 0.80 | +5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAKRX | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 0.23 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.49 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.41 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.58 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAKRX and SPHD is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PAKRX vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
PAKRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than SPHD's 4.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAKRX T. Rowe Price Target 2030 Fund | 7.19% | 7.16% | 4.31% | 3.54% | 6.16% | 3.54% | 2.99% | 3.62% | 5.26% | 1.90% | 1.79% | 1.76% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.32% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Drawdowns
PAKRX vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAKRX drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAKRX and SPHD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAKRX | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.66% | -41.39% | +16.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.75% | -11.33% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.65% | -19.50% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.66% | -41.39% | +16.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -5.48% | +1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -4.70% | +0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 3.53% | -1.92% |
Volatility
PAKRX vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Target 2030 Fund (PAKRX) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 3.15%. This indicates that PAKRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAKRX | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 3.15% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.34% | 7.86% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.00% | 14.46% | -5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 14.20% | -5.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.94% | 17.65% | -7.71% |