PAGLX vs. PRWCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PAGLX (T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund) and PRWCX (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund) are both mutual funds - PAGLX is a Global Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while PRWCX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, PAGLX returned 12.88%/yr vs 11.25%/yr for PRWCX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PAGLX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for PRWCX.

Performance

PAGLX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAGLX achieves a 13.66% return, which is significantly higher than PRWCX's 5.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PAGLX has outperformed PRWCX with an annualized return of 12.88%, while PRWCX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.25% annualized return.

PAGLX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 6.77%
• YTD: 13.66%
• 6M: 13.40%
• 1Y: 26.47%
• 3Y*: 18.36%
• 5Y*: 5.84%
• 10Y*: 12.88%

PRWCX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: 5.76%
• 6M: 5.87%
• 1Y: 14.88%
• 3Y*: 13.48%
• 5Y*: 8.87%
• 10Y*: 11.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAGLX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAGLX T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund	13.66%	14.37%	18.57%	18.99%	-29.87%	10.73%	43.90%	30.55%	-7.22%	34.08%
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund	5.76%	12.45%	12.50%	18.85%	-12.00%	18.45%	18.13%	24.62%	0.63%	15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PAGLX and PRWCX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2008	0.89

The correlation between PAGLX and PRWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PAGLX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAGLX

PAGLX Risk / Return Rank: 45
PAGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
PAGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
PAGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
PAGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PAGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

PRWCX

PRWCX Risk / Return Rank: 49
PRWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PRWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PRWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
PRWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
PRWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAGLX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAGLX	PRWCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.08	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	2.97	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.39	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	2.45	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.35	10.72	-0.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAGLX vs. PRWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the PRWCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAGLX and PRWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAGLX	PRWCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	2.08	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.70	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.89	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.91	-0.23

Drawdowns

PAGLX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAGLX drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, roughly equal to the maximum PRWCX drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAGLX and PRWCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAGLX	PRWCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.76%	-41.77%	+2.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.51%	-6.32%	-4.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.71%	-15.96%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.76%	-17.07%	-22.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.76%	-26.86%	-12.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.42%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.72%	-3.33%	-4.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	1.44%	+1.15%

Volatility

PAGLX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 1.92%. This indicates that PAGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAGLX	PRWCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.92%	1.92%	+2.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.99%	6.04%	+4.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.73%	7.45%	+6.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.52%	12.74%	+4.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.05%	12.74%	+5.31%

PAGLX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAGLX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAGLX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison

PAGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.18%, more than PRWCX's 8.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAGLX T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund	10.18%	11.57%	0.00%	0.08%	0.07%	8.74%	3.13%	0.20%	1.38%	0.75%	0.21%	4.82%
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund	8.33%	8.81%	10.38%	4.15%	9.44%	9.23%	7.97%	5.83%	7.46%	6.82%	3.51%	9.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAGLX and PRWCX in my portfolio?

PAGLX and PRWCX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAGLX or PRWCX?

PAGLX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to PRWCX (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAGLX dropped -39.76% vs PRWCX's -41.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.