PAGLX vs. PRDGX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX).
PAGLX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 26, 2008. PRDGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 30, 1992.
Performance
PAGLX vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAGLX vs. PRDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAGLX T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund | -6.68% | 14.37% | 18.57% | 18.99% | -29.87% | 10.73% | 43.90% | 30.55% | -7.22% | 34.08% |
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. | -2.47% | 14.74% | 13.48% | 13.68% | -10.22% | 26.03% | 13.92% | 31.76% | -1.06% | 18.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAGLX achieves a -6.68% return, which is significantly lower than PRDGX's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PAGLX has underperformed PRDGX with an annualized return of 10.87%, while PRDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.09% annualized return.
PAGLX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- -6.68%
- 6M
- -4.81%
- 1Y
- 10.32%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
PRDGX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -7.31%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 9.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAGLX vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAGLX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PRDGX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAGLX vs. PRDGX — Risk / Return Rank
PAGLX
PRDGX
PAGLX vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAGLX | PRDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 0.71 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 1.08 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.16 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 0.80 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | 3.83 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAGLX | PRDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 0.71 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.66 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.76 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.65 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAGLX and PRDGX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PAGLX vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison
PAGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.40%, more than PRDGX's 8.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAGLX T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund | 12.40% | 11.57% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 8.74% | 3.13% | 0.20% | 1.38% | 0.75% | 0.21% | 4.82% |
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. | 8.30% | 8.02% | 4.66% | 2.78% | 3.81% | 2.00% | 1.03% | 2.33% | 3.67% | 1.82% | 3.07% | 7.57% |
Drawdowns
PAGLX vs. PRDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAGLX drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum PRDGX drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAGLX and PRDGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAGLX | PRDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -49.79% | +10.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -11.28% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.76% | -19.31% | -20.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.76% | -33.18% | -6.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.51% | -7.32% | -3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -5.44% | -2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 2.34% | +0.53% |
Volatility
PAGLX vs. PRDGX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) at 3.43%. This indicates that PAGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAGLX | PRDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 3.43% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 7.35% | +3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.21% | 15.00% | +2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 14.05% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 15.86% | +2.13% |