PAEAX vs. TIBIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund (PAEAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX).
PAEAX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Feb 7, 1994. TIBIX is an actively managed fund by Thornburg. It was launched on Dec 24, 2002.
Performance
PAEAX vs. TIBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAEAX vs. TIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAEAX Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund | -1.58% | 18.45% | 18.71% | 20.78% | -16.99% | 16.63% | 14.41% | 20.79% | -9.73% | 19.92% |
TIBIX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I | 9.82% | 37.01% | 13.48% | 18.28% | -7.69% | 20.36% | -0.40% | 18.01% | -4.31% | 15.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAEAX achieves a -1.58% return, which is significantly lower than TIBIX's 9.82% return. Over the past 10 years, PAEAX has underperformed TIBIX with an annualized return of 10.16%, while TIBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.18% annualized return.
PAEAX
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 17.92%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
TIBIX
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAEAX vs. TIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAEAX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBIX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAEAX vs. TIBIX — Risk / Return Rank
PAEAX
TIBIX
PAEAX vs. TIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund (PAEAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAEAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 3.57 | -2.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 4.54 | -2.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.79 | -0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 4.43 | -2.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.02 | 21.79 | -13.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAEAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 3.57 | -2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 1.40 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.91 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.75 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAEAX and TIBIX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PAEAX vs. TIBIX - Dividend Comparison
PAEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than TIBIX's 5.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAEAX Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund | 6.94% | 6.83% | 11.00% | 4.18% | 1.73% | 14.90% | 0.47% | 1.56% | 10.41% | 10.22% | 1.58% | 6.53% |
TIBIX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I | 5.40% | 5.83% | 5.67% | 4.89% | 5.89% | 5.33% | 4.31% | 4.46% | 4.77% | 4.52% | 4.14% | 4.66% |
Drawdowns
PAEAX vs. TIBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAEAX drawdown since its inception was -53.25%, which is greater than TIBIX's maximum drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAEAX and TIBIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAEAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.25% | -48.88% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.31% | -8.58% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.30% | -20.79% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.57% | -34.85% | +6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.36% | -3.47% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -6.00% | -1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 1.75% | +0.38% |
Volatility
PAEAX vs. TIBIX - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund (PAEAX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) at 3.68%. This indicates that PAEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAEAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 3.68% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 6.57% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.96% | 10.83% | +4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.37% | 11.11% | +4.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 13.48% | +1.48% |