PACJX vs. FRAMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PACJX (Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund) and FRAMX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, PACJX returned 12.10%/yr vs 2.63%/yr for FRAMX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PACJX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FRAMX.

Performance

PACJX vs. FRAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund (PACJX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PACJX achieves a 11.16% return, which is significantly higher than FRAMX's 3.94% return.

PACJX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 4.82%
• YTD: 11.16%
• 6M: 12.06%
• 1Y: 26.86%
• 3Y*: 21.74%
• 5Y*: 12.10%
• 10Y*: —

FRAMX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 3.94%
• 6M: 4.15%
• 1Y: 10.14%
• 3Y*: 7.28%
• 5Y*: 2.63%
• 10Y*: 3.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PACJX vs. FRAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PACJX Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund	11.16%	19.51%	15.39%	30.61%	-17.58%	19.58%	15.82%
FRAMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A	3.94%	9.55%	4.04%	7.80%	-11.87%	2.52%	7.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PACJX and FRAMX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020	0.70

The correlation between PACJX and FRAMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (5 years) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PACJX vs. FRAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PACJX

PACJX Risk / Return Rank: 74
PACJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PACJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
PACJX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
PACJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PACJX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FRAMX

FRAMX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FRAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FRAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FRAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FRAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FRAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PACJX vs. FRAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund (PACJX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PACJX	FRAMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	2.46	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	3.62	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.49	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	2.96	+0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.45	12.58	+2.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PACJX vs. FRAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PACJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FRAMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PACJX and FRAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PACJX	FRAMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51	2.46	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.50	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.52	+0.25

Drawdowns

PACJX vs. FRAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PACJX drawdown since its inception was -32.14%, smaller than the maximum FRAMX drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACJX and FRAMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PACJX	FRAMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.14%	-33.94%	+1.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.03%	-3.45%	-4.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.69%	-5.02%	-10.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.11%	-16.31%	-7.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-16.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-3.83%	-1.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	0.81%	+0.95%

Volatility

PACJX vs. FRAMX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund (PACJX) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) at 1.67%. This indicates that PACJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PACJX	FRAMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	1.67%	+1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.45%	3.43%	+5.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.88%	4.16%	+6.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.05%	5.28%	+9.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.91%	4.52%	+13.39%

PACJX vs. FRAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PACJX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FRAMX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

PACJX vs. FRAMX - Dividend Comparison

PACJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.95%, more than FRAMX's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRAMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A	2.84%	2.77%	2.77%	2.58%	4.26%	3.31%	2.23%	2.37%	4.40%	8.26%	1.42%	1.42%
PACJX Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund	8.95%	9.94%	6.26%	4.56%	9.65%	17.43%	1.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PACJX and FRAMX in my portfolio?

PACJX and FRAMX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PACJX or FRAMX?

PACJX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to FRAMX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PACJX dropped -32.14% vs FRAMX's -33.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PACJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.