PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PACJX vs. FRHMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PACJX vs. FRHMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund (PACJX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PACJX vs. FRHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PACJX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund
-1.63%19.51%15.39%30.61%-17.58%19.58%15.82%
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
0.28%10.02%4.50%8.28%-11.48%2.98%8.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PACJX achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than FRHMX's 0.28% return.


PACJX

1D
2.59%
1M
-4.73%
YTD
-1.63%
6M
0.89%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
18.24%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*

FRHMX

1D
0.74%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
0.28%
6M
1.40%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PACJX vs. FRHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PACJX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FRHMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PACJX vs. FRHMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PACJX
PACJX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PACJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PACJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PACJX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PACJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PACJX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FRHMX
FRHMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FRHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PACJX vs. FRHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund (PACJX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PACJXFRHMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

1.75

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

2.45

-0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.38

-0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.90

9.46

-0.56

PACJX vs. FRHMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PACJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the FRHMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PACJX and FRHMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PACJXFRHMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.75

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.51

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.73

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between PACJX and FRHMX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PACJX vs. FRHMX - Dividend Comparison

PACJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.11%, more than FRHMX's 3.36% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
PACJX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund
10.11%9.94%6.26%4.56%9.65%17.43%1.94%0.00%
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
3.36%3.22%3.24%3.02%4.77%3.78%2.61%1.95%

Drawdowns

PACJX vs. FRHMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PACJX drawdown since its inception was -32.14%, which is greater than FRHMX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACJX and FRHMX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PACJXFRHMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.14%

-15.96%

-16.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-3.42%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-15.96%

-8.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.65%

-2.45%

-3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-3.58%

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

0.86%

+1.38%

Volatility

PACJX vs. FRHMX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund (PACJX) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) at 2.13%. This indicates that PACJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PACJXFRHMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

2.13%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

2.94%

+5.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.44%

4.63%

+10.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.05%

5.23%

+9.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

5.14%

+12.92%